The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process
Open accessAbstract
Addition of a calcium-based CO2 acceptor to commercial steam methane reforming catalyst permits the production of 95+% H2 in a single-step process. The combined reforming, shift, and CO2 separation reactions have been studied using a laboratory-scale fixed-bed reactor as a function of temperature, steam-to-methane ratio, acceptor-to-catalyst ratio, feed gas flow rate, and methane content of the feed gas. The combined reactions were sufficiently rapid above 550°C that equilibrium was closely approached at all reaction conditions studied. The H2 content of the product gas was relatively independent of temperature with the primary impurity at lower temperatures being CH4. Higher temperatures resulted in increased CH4 conversion but decreased carbon oxide removal leaving CO and CO2 as the primary impurities. Potential advantages of the single-step process, in addition to reducing the number of processing steps, include improved energy efficiency, elimination of the need for shift catalysts, and reduction in the temperature of the primary reactor by 150–200°C. Key unanswered problems involving the single-step process include continuous separation of catalyst and acceptor and the durability of the acceptor for multiple cycle operation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of CO2 capture technologies
MacDowell, N., Florin, N., Buchard, A., Hallett, J., Galindo, A., Jackson, G., Adjiman, C. S., Williams, C. K., Shah, N., & Fennell, P. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c004106h · Cited by 1,636
The calcium looping cycle for large-scale CO2 capture
Blamey, J., Anthony, E. J., Wang, J., & Fennell, P. S. (2010) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.10.001 · Cited by 1,044
Chaubey, R., Sahu, S., James, O. O., & Maity, S. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.019 · Cited by 639
Chemical looping beyond combustion – a perspective
Zhu, X., Imtiaz, Q., Donat, F., Müller, C. R., & Li, F. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee03793d · Cited by 538
Fan, L.-S., Zeng, L., Wang, W., & Luo, S. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee03198a · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Balasubramanian, B., Lopez Ortiz, A., Kaytakoglu, S., & Harrison, D. P.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 15-16
- Pages
- 3543-3552
- ISSN
- 0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015935174
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0009-2509(98)00425-4
- The paper
- Balasubramanian, B., Lopez Ortiz, A., Kaytakoglu, S., & Harrison, D. P. (1999). Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process. Chemical Engineering Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(98)00425-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.