The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chemical looping processes for CO2 capture and carbonaceous fuel conversion – prospect and opportunity
Abstract
Chemical looping processes offer a compelling way for effective and viable carbonaceous fuel conversion into clean energy carriers. The uniqueness of chemical looping processes includes their capability of low cost in situ carbon capture, high efficiency energy conversion scheme, and advanced compatibility with state-of-the-art technologies. Based on the different functions of looping particles, two types of chemical looping technologies and associated processes have been developed. Type I chemical looping systems utilize oxygen carrier particles to perform the reduction–oxidation cycles, while Type II chemical looping systems utilize CO2 carrier particles to conduct carbonation–calcination cycles. The exergy analysis indicates that the chemical looping strategy has the potential to improve fossil fuel conversion schemes. Chemical looping particle performance and looping reactor engineering are the key drivers to the success of chemical looping process development. In this work, the desired particle characterization and recent progress in mechanism studies are generalized, which is followed by a discussion on the looping reactor design. This perspective also illustrates various chemical looping processes for combustion and gasification applications. It shows that both Type I and Type II looping processes have great potentials for flexible and efficient production of electricity, hydrogen and liquid fuels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program
Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., & Srivastava, R. D. (2008) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00094-1 · Cited by 2,281
Process analysis for ammonia-based CO2 capture in ironmaking industry
Rhee, C. H., Kim, J. Y., Han, K., Ahn, C. K., & Chun, H. D. (2011) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.015 · Cited by 65
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02342a · Cited by 4,374
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Biomass-based chemical looping technologies: the good, the bad and the future
Zhao, X., Zhou, H., Sikarwar, V. S., Zhao, M., Park, A.-H. A., Fennell, P. S., Shen, L., & Fan, L.-S. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee03718f · Cited by 558
Self-citationReview of hydrogen production using chemical-looping technology
Luo, M., Yi, Y., Wang, S., Wang, Z., Du, M., Pan, J., & Wang, Q. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.007 · Cited by 528
Significant Advances in C1 Catalysis: Highly Efficient Catalysts and Catalytic Reactions
Bao, J., Yang, G., Yoneyama, Y., & Tsubaki, N. (2019) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b03924 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, L.-S., Zeng, L., Wang, W., & Luo, S.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 7254
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W1984265668
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical looping processes for CO2 capture and carbonaceous fuel conversion – prospect and opportunity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2ee03198a
- The paper
- Fan, L.-S., Zeng, L., Wang, W., & Luo, S. (2012). Chemical looping processes for CO2 capture and carbonaceous fuel conversion – prospect and opportunity. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee03198a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.