Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 387

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of grapefruit juice on digoxin pharmacokinetics in humans

Becquemont, Laurent, Verstuyft, Céline, Kerb, Reinhold, Brinkmann, Ulrich, Lebot, Martine, Jaillon, Patrice, Funck‐Brentano, Christian·2001·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Objectives: Grapefruit juice is responsible for drug interactions mediated by intestinal cytochrome P4503A4 inhibition and possibly P‐glycoprotein inhibition in enterocytes. Our main objective was to determine whether grapefruit juice alters the bioavailability of digoxin, a P‐glycoprotein substrate. The secondary objective was to determine whether the magnitude of the pharmacokinetic interaction was influenced by P‐glycoprotein genetic polymorphism. Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers participated in this open randomized crossover study comparing the effect of grapefruit juice consumption (versus water) on the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of digoxin (0.5 mg). The P‐glycoprotein genotype was determined according to MDR1 genetic polymorphism in exon 26 (C3435T). Results: Grapefruit juice had no significant effect on the maximum plasma drug concentration (C max) of digoxin or the area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) from time zero to 48 hours. However, there was a 9% increase in the digoxin AUC from time zero to 4 hours and from time zero to 24 hours (P = .01) during grapefruit juice administration. The digoxin renal clearance remained unchanged during both periods. No relationship between MDR1 C3435T genotype and early digoxin pharmacokinetic changes could be detected. Conclusion: The modest changes in digoxin pharmacokinetics observed during grapefruit juice ingestion do not support an important P‐glycoprotein inhibition. Under our experimental conditions, grapefruit juice‐mediated P‐glycoprotein inhibition does not appear to play a relevant role in drug interactions, at least when assessed by use of digoxin disposition kinetics. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2001) 70, 311–316; doi: 10.1016/S0009‐9236(01)17221‐8

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0009-9236(01)17221-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 387

Metadata

Authors
Becquemont, L., Verstuyft, C., Kerb, R., Brinkmann, U., Lebot, M., Jaillon, P., & Funck‐Brentano, C.
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-10
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
311-316
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W4297820854
Cited by
387
References
0
FWCI
23.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of grapefruit juice on digoxin pharmacokinetics in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0009-9236(01)17221-8
The paper
Becquemont, L., Verstuyft, C., Kerb, R., Brinkmann, U., Lebot, M., Jaillon, P., & Funck‐Brentano, C. (2001). Effect of grapefruit juice on digoxin pharmacokinetics in humans. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9236(01)17221-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.