The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of grapefruit juice on digoxin pharmacokinetics in humans
Abstract
Objectives: Grapefruit juice is responsible for drug interactions mediated by intestinal cytochrome P4503A4 inhibition and possibly P‐glycoprotein inhibition in enterocytes. Our main objective was to determine whether grapefruit juice alters the bioavailability of digoxin, a P‐glycoprotein substrate. The secondary objective was to determine whether the magnitude of the pharmacokinetic interaction was influenced by P‐glycoprotein genetic polymorphism. Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers participated in this open randomized crossover study comparing the effect of grapefruit juice consumption (versus water) on the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of digoxin (0.5 mg). The P‐glycoprotein genotype was determined according to MDR1 genetic polymorphism in exon 26 (C3435T). Results: Grapefruit juice had no significant effect on the maximum plasma drug concentration (C max) of digoxin or the area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) from time zero to 48 hours. However, there was a 9% increase in the digoxin AUC from time zero to 4 hours and from time zero to 24 hours (P = .01) during grapefruit juice administration. The digoxin renal clearance remained unchanged during both periods. No relationship between MDR1 C3435T genotype and early digoxin pharmacokinetic changes could be detected. Conclusion: The modest changes in digoxin pharmacokinetics observed during grapefruit juice ingestion do not support an important P‐glycoprotein inhibition. Under our experimental conditions, grapefruit juice‐mediated P‐glycoprotein inhibition does not appear to play a relevant role in drug interactions, at least when assessed by use of digoxin disposition kinetics. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2001) 70, 311–316; doi: 10.1016/S0009‐9236(01)17221‐8
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dietary flavonoids: Effects on xenobiotic and carcinogen metabolism
Moon, Y. J., Wang, X., & Morris, M. E. (2006) · Toxicology in Vitro · doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2005.06.048 · Cited by 869
Interactions Between Herbal Medicines and Prescribed Drugs: An Updated Systematic Review
Izzo, A. A., & Ernst, E. (2009) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/11317010-000000000-00000 · Cited by 801
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Coté, C. J., Wilson, S., & the Work Group on Sedation (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2780 · Cited by 555
Johnson, T. N., Rostami-Hodjegan, A., & Tucker, G. T. (2006) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200645090-00005 · Cited by 530
Herbal Remedies in the United States: Potential Adverse Interactions With Anticancer Agents
Sparreboom, A., Cox, M. C., Acharya, M. R., & Figg, W. D. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.08.182 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Becquemont, L., Verstuyft, C., Kerb, R., Brinkmann, U., Lebot, M., Jaillon, P., & Funck‐Brentano, C.
- Venue
- Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 311-316
- ISSN
- 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6535
- OpenAlex
- W4297820854
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of grapefruit juice on digoxin pharmacokinetics in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0009-9236(01)17221-8
- The paper
- Becquemont, L., Verstuyft, C., Kerb, R., Brinkmann, U., Lebot, M., Jaillon, P., & Funck‐Brentano, C. (2001). Effect of grapefruit juice on digoxin pharmacokinetics in humans. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9236(01)17221-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.