The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: evidence for limitations in processing space
Open accessAbstract
Five experiments using the Headturn Preference Procedure examined 15- and 18-month-old children's sensitivity to morphosyntactic dependencies in English. In each experiment, the children were exposed to two types of passages. Passages in the experimental condition contained a well-formed English dependency between the auxiliary verb is and a main verb with the ending -ing. Passages in the control condition contained an ungrammatical combination of the modal auxiliary can and a main verb with the ending -ing. In the experiments, the distance between the dependent morphemes was systematically varied by inserting an adverbial of a specified length between the auxiliary and main verbs. The results indicated that 18-month-olds are sensitive to the basic relationship between is and -ing, but that 15-month-olds are not. The 18-month-olds, but not the 15-month-olds, listened significantly longer to the passages with the well-formed English dependency. In addition, the 18-month-olds showed this preference for the well-formed dependency only over a limited domain of 1-3 syllables. Over domains of 4-5 syllables, they showed no significant preference for the experimental over the control passages. These findings indicate that 18-month-olds can track relationships between functor morphemes. Additionally, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that 18-month-olds are working with a limited processing window, and that they are only picking up relevant dependencies that fall within this window.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 · Cited by 5,659
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk
MacWhinney, B. (1992) · Child Language Teaching and Therapy · doi:10.1177/026565909200800211 · Cited by 3,396
Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small
Elman, J. L. (1993) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90058-4 · Cited by 1,988
Cairns, H. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996) · Language · doi:10.2307/416113 · Cited by 1,920
Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection?
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(90)90004-j · Cited by 1,487
Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars
Bloom, L. M. (1970) · Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University) · doi:10.7916/d8s75gt1 · Cited by 1,320
Brown, R. (1973) · Cited by 1,293
Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory
King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(91)90027-h · Cited by 1,190
Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech
Jusczyk, P. W., & Aslin, R. N. (1995) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1995.1010 · Cited by 1,061
Self-citation
Cited by
Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code
Kuhl, P. K. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1533 · Cited by 2,291
Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech
Mintz, T. H. (2003) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00140-9 · Cited by 597
Statistical learning and language acquisition
Romberg, A. R., & Saffran, J. R. (2010) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.78 · Cited by 517
Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition
Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01467-4 · Cited by 506
Naps promote abstraction in language-learning infants
Gómez, R. L., Bootzin, R. R., & Nadel, L. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01764.x · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Santelmann, L. M., & Jusczyk, P. W.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-134
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000781199
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: evidence for limitations in processing space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00060-2
- The paper
- Santelmann, L. M., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: evidence for limitations in processing space. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00060-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.