The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children
Open accessAbstract
A great deal of psycholinguistic research has focused on the question of how adults interpret language in real time. This work has revealed a complex and interactive language processing system capable of rapidly coordinating linguistic properties of the message with information from the context or situation (e.g. Altmann & Steedman, 1988; Britt, 1994; Tanenhaus, Spivey-Knowlton, Eberhard & Sedivy, 1995; Trueswell & Tanenhaus, 1991). In the study of language acquisition, however, surprisingly little is known about how children process language in real time and whether they coordinate multiple sources of information during interpretation. The lack of child research is due in part to the fact that most existing techniques for studying language processing have relied upon the skill of reading, an ability that young children do not have or are only beginning to acquire. We present here results from a new method for studying children's moment-by-moment language processing abilities, in which a head-mounted eye-tracking system was used to monitor eye movements as participants responded to spoken instructions. The results revealed systematic differences in how children and adults process spoken language: Five Year Olds did not take into account relevant discourse/pragmatic principles when resolving temporary syntactic ambiguities, and showed little or no ability to revise initial parsing commitments. Adults showed sensitivity to these discourse constraints at the earliest possible stages of processing, and were capable of revising incorrect parsing commitments. Implications for current models of sentence processing are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank
Marcus, M. (1993) · doi:10.21236/ada273556 · Cited by 7,405
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
Integration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7777863 · Cited by 2,929
Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies
Gibson, E. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1 · Cited by 2,537
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676 · Cited by 2,259
Cognition and the Development of Language
Bloom, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412449 · Cited by 2,081
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1 · Cited by 1,767
Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9 · Cited by 1,752
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2558 · Cited by 1,604
The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1 · Cited by 1,400
Cited by
The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1500031x · Cited by 733
Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension
Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.5.3.263 · Cited by 682
Self-citationArnold, J. (2000) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00073-1 · Cited by 365
A Probabilistic Constraints Approach to Language Acquisition and Processing
Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1999) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2304_8 · Cited by 335
Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension
Arai, M., van Gompel, R. P. G., & Scheepers, C. (2007) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.07.001 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-134
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975046435
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00032-3
- The paper
- Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00032-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.