Cited by 60Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeElectronic Health Records SystemsTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health

Beyond effectiveness: the evaluation of information systems using a comprehensive health technology assessment framework

Kazanjian, Arminée, Green, Carolyn J·2002·Computers in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

A Comprehensive Health Technology Assessment Framework is presented as a conceptual tool for decision-making about health technologies, including information technologies. The aim of the model is to provide an empirical, evidence-based foundation for health technology decisions. The major framework dimensions are (1) population at risk, (2) population impact, (3) economic concerns, (4) social context (including ethical, legal, and political concerns), and (5) technology assessment information. This multi-disciplinary approach provides guidelines on use of appropriate information in aligning 'stakeholder wants' and 'population needs'.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-4825(02)00013-6

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kazanjian, A., & Green, C. J.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Green, Carolyn J
Venue
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
165-177
ISSN
0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091500337
Cited by
60
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Keywords
health technology assessment, information system evaluation, health information technology, decision-making framework, vulnerable populations, population effects, economic evaluation, social environment, stakeholder needs, evidence-based decision making
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Organizational, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Medical Informatics, Technology Assessment, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review