The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sound-Colour Synaesthesia: to What Extent Does it Use Cross-Modal Mechanisms Common to us All?
Open accessAbstract
This study examines a group of synaesthetes who report colour sensations in response to music and other sounds. Experiment 1 shows that synaesthetes choose more precise colours and are more internally consistent in their choice of colours given a set of sounds of varying pitch, timbre and composition (single notes or dyads) relative to a group of controls. In spite of this difference, both controls and synaesthetes appear to use the same heuristics for matching between auditory and visual domains (e.g., pitch to lightness). We take this as evidence that synaesthesia may recruit some of the mechanisms used in normal cross-modal perception. Experiment 2 establishes that synaesthetic colours are automatically elicited insofar as they give rise to cross-modal Stroop interference. Experiment 3 uses a variant of the cross-modal Posner paradigm in which detection of a lateralised target is enhanced when combined with a non-informative but synaesthetically congruent sound-colour pairing. This suggests that synaesthesia uses the same (or an analogous) mechanism of exogenous cross-modal orienting as normal perception. Overall, the results support the conclusion that this form of synaesthesia recruits some of the same mechanisms used in normal cross-modal perception rather than using direct, privileged pathways between unimodal auditory and unimodal visual areas that are absent in most other adults.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calvert, G. A., Campbell, R., & Brammer, M. J. (2000) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00513-3 · Cited by 954
Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting
Spence, C., & Driver, J. (1997) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206843 · Cited by 475
Multisensory perception: Beyond modularity and convergence
Driver, J., & Spence, C. (2000) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00740-5 · Cited by 465
Cited by
Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review
Spence, C. (2011) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7 · Cited by 1,618
Synaesthesia: The Prevalence of Atypical Cross-Modal Experiences
Simner, J., Mulvenna, C., Sagiv, N., Tsakanikos, E., Witherby, S. A., Fraser, C., Scott, K., & Ward, J. (2006) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p5469 · Cited by 656
Self-citationMusic–color associations are mediated by emotion
Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., Xu, Z., & Prado-León, L. R. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1212562110 · Cited by 403
Seth, A. K. (2014) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2013.877880 · Cited by 346
Nanay, B. (2018) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.006 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- WARD, J., HUCKSTEP, B., & TSAKANIKOS, E.
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 264-280
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020344772
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sound-Colour Synaesthesia: to What Extent Does it Use Cross-Modal Mechanisms Common to us All? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70352-6
- The paper
- WARD, J., HUCKSTEP, B., & TSAKANIKOS, E. (2006). Sound-Colour Synaesthesia: to What Extent Does it Use Cross-Modal Mechanisms Common to us All? Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70352-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.