The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Where Do Semantic Errors Come From?
Open accessAbstract
We report the performance of two brain-damaged subjects (RGB and HW) whose frequent errors in spoken production are nearly always semantically related to the target word. Both subjects show similar, high rates of these "semantic" errors in oral naming and oral reading; yet neither subject makes semantic errors in comparable written tasks. Further, results of a variety of lexical tasks with the same stimuli demonstrate unimpaired comprehension of printed or spoken words, including those that are orally produced as semantic errors. These patterns of performance are interpreted as resulting from damage to the phonological output lexicon. The postulated deficit is contrasted to the hypothesis of impairment to the lexical-semantic component, required to explain performance by brain-damaged subjects described elsewhere who make seemingly identical types of oral production errors to those of RGB and HW, but, in addition, make comparable errors in writing and comprehension tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interaction of information in word recognition.
Morton, J. (1969) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0027366 · Cited by 2,151
Normative Data and Screening Power of a Shortened Version of the Token Test
De Renzi, E., & Faglioni, P. (1978) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(78)80006-9 · Cited by 1,121
Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach
Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. (1973) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/bf01067101 · Cited by 1,027
Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination
Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2018) · Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_868-4 · Cited by 667
From neuropsychology to mental structure
Jennekens-Schinkel, A. (1989) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-510x(89)90066-x · Cited by 544
Humphreys, G. W., & Evett, L. J. (1985) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00045684 · Cited by 323
Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing
Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1990) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643299008253442 · Cited by 305
Self-citationSingle and multiple component central dyslexic syndromes
Shallice, T. (1995) · Neurocase · doi:10.1093/neucas/1.3.251-l · Cited by 235
Cognitive neuropsychology and the study of reading
Coltheart, M. (1985) · Attention and performance · Cited by 208
Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication
Jones, G. V. (1985) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(85)90094-x · Cited by 166
Cited by
Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations
Levelt, W. J. M. (1992) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90038-j · Cited by 709
Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain
Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349788a0 · Cited by 666
Self-citationLesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia.
Hinton, G. E., & Shallice, T. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.98.1.74 · Cited by 655
Double dissociation without modularity: Evidence from connectionist neuropsychology
Plaut, D. C. (1995) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/01688639508405124 · Cited by 306
Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing
Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1990) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643299008253442 · Cited by 305
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E.
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-122
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964768299
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Where Do Semantic Errors Come From? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80077-9
- The paper
- Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1990). Where Do Semantic Errors Come From? Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80077-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
