The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nanofiltration of textile wastewater for water reuse
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One of the primary benefits of nanofiltration is its reduced energy consumption, which leads to a higher efficiency in the removal of contaminants.
“One of the primary benefits of NF is its reduced energy consumption, which leads to a higher efficiency in the removal of contaminants [239].”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [239]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Pagga, 1994, Development of a method for adsorption of dyestuff on activated sludge, Water Research, 28, 1051, 10.1016/0043-1354(94)90190-2 · DOI
- Vandevivere, 1998, Treatment and reuse of wastewater from the textile wet-processing industry: Review of emerging technologies, J. Chem. Tech. Biotech., 72, 289, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199808)72:4<289::AID-JCTB905>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
- Rozzi, 1999, Textile wastewater reuse in northern Italy (Como), Water Sci. Tech., 39, 121, 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00093-1 · DOI
- Wu, 1998, Evaluation of membrane filtration and ozonation processes for treatment of reactive dye wastewater, J. Environ. Eng.- ASCE, 124, 272, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:3(272) · DOI
- Gahr, 1994, Ozonation — an important technique to comply with new German laws for textile wastewater treatment, Water Sci. Tech., 30, 255, 10.2166/wst.1994.0115 · DOI
- Tsuru, 1991, Negative rejection of anions in the loose reverse osmosis separation of mono- and divalent ion mixtures, Desalination, 81, 219, 10.1016/0011-9164(91)85055-Y · DOI
- Peeters, 1998, Retention measurements of nanofiltration membranes with electrolyte solutions, J. Membr. Sci., 145, 199, 10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00079-9 · DOI
- Watters, 1991, Ultrafiltration of a textile plant effluent, Separation Sci. & Tech., 26, 1295, 10.1080/01496399108050533 · DOI
- Erswell, 1988, The reuse of reactive dye liquors using charged ultrafiltration membrane technology, Desalination, 70, 157, 10.1016/0011-9164(88)85051-3 · DOI
- Xu, 1999, Treatment of textile dye plant effluent by nanofiltration membrane, Separation Sci. & Tech., 34, 2501, 10.1081/SS-100100787 · DOI
- Van der Bruggen, 2001, Mechanisms of retention and flux decline for the nanofiltration of dye baths from the textile industry, Separation & Purification Tech., 22–23, 519, 10.1016/S1383-5866(00)00134-9 · DOI
- Schirg, 1992, Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for the separation of aqueous dye-salt solutions, Desalination, 89, 89, 10.1016/0011-9164(92)80154-2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Periyasamy, A. P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020495 · Cited by 652
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, C., & Chen, V.
- Venue
- Desalination
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-20
- ISSN
- 0011-9164
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
