The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance of an ultra-low-pressure reverse osmosis membrane (ULPROM) for separating heavy metal: effects of interference parameters
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The RO separation process was used to extract heavy metal ions, including Ni 2+ , Cr 6+ , and Cu 2+ from electroplating wastewater, with a removal efficiency of >98.75 62 .”
From Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a comprehensive and critical review (2021) · cites this paper as [62]
Citations
Cites
New membrane developments expanding the horizon for the application of reverse osmosis technology
Gerard, R., Hachisuka, H., & Hirose, M. (1998) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/s0011-9164(98)00102-7 · Cited by 78
Performance of low pressure reverse osmosis membrane (LPROM) for separating mono- and divalent ions
Ujang, Z., & Anderson, G. K. (1998) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s0273-1223(98)00553-8 · Cited by 41
DBP Control by Nanofiltration: Cost and Performance
Blau, T. J., Taylor, J. S., Morris, K. E., & Mulford, L. A. (1992) · American Water Works Association · doi:10.1002/j.1551-8833.1992.tb05907.x · Cited by 38
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a comprehensive and critical review
Qasem, N. A. A., Mohammed, R. H., & Lawal, D. U. (2021) · npj Clean Water · doi:10.1038/s41545-021-00127-0 · Cited by 2,225
Physico–chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals
Kurniawan, T. A., Chan, G. Y. S., Lo, W.-H., & Babel, S. (2006) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2006.01.015 · Cited by 2,072
Activated carbons and low cost adsorbents for remediation of tri- and hexavalent chromium from water
Mohan, D., & Pittman Jr., C. U. (2006) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.060 · Cited by 1,855
Sustainable technologies for water purification from heavy metals: review and analysis
Bolisetty, S., Peydayesh, M., & Mezzenga, R. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00493e · Cited by 1,512
Removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters: a review
Azimi, A., Azari, A., Rezakazemi, M., & Ansarpour, M. (2017) · ChemBioEng Reviews · doi:10.1002/cben.201600010 · Cited by 1,267
Metadata
- Authors
- Ozaki, H., Sharma, K., & Saktaywin, W.
- Affiliations
- Osaka Sangyo University (JP)
- Asian Institute of Technology (TH)
- Ministry of Science and Technology Thailand (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Sharma, Kusumakar
- ORCID
- Ozaki, Hiroaki
- Venue
- Desalination
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 287-294
- ISSN
- 0011-9164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024955362
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Desalination (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Keywords
- heavy metal separation, copper, nickel, hexavalent chromium, aromatic polyamide membranes, heavy metal rejection, feed pressure, pH effect, divalent ions, calcium and magnesium interference, industrial wastewater treatment, heavy metal recovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
