Cited by 125Neural dynamics and brain functionEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesChaos control and synchronization

The evolution of complexity in human brain development: an EEG study

Meyer-Lindenberg, A.·1996·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Analysis of the EEG as a signal from a deterministic non-linear system should, in principle, allow insights into the complexity of underlying brain activity. We examined the capability of this method to analyse the marked changes in brain activity during normal brain development. Resting EEGs of 54 healthy children (newborns to 14 years old) and of 12 normal adults were recorded digitally. The following parameters were calculated: correlation dimension, a measure of the complexity of the underlying system, and the first Lyapunov coefficient, indicating the system's 'unpredictability'. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with probands grouped by age. The subgroups of children older than 1 year was further examined by regression analysis. In all analysed epochs, Lyapunov coefficients were significantly positive (P < 0.0001. t-test). The presence of non-linear dynamics was asserted statistically in 64-76% of examined epochs. A highly significant increase in correlation dimension with age was found in all examined leads (P < 0.0001, ANOVA). In all age groups, marked differences in correlation dimension in different brain regions became evident (P < 0.01-0.0001, ANOVA). Evidence for the presence of non-linearity can be found even in newborns. Brain maturation was reflected in a marked and highly significant increase in correlation dimension (complexity). Our work indicates that non-linear dynamics analysis is suitable for measuring complexity of brain activity during maturation and provides age-dependent normal values as a basis for further study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0013-4694(96)95699-0

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive brain development is heteromodal.

    “The heteromodal nature of cognitive brain development is evident from studies of neurocognitive performance (6, 7), functional imaging (functional MRI or positronemission tomography) (8–10), and electroencephalogram coherence studies (1, 2, 10).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer-Lindenberg, A.
Venue
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-11
Volume
99
Issue
5
Pages
405-411
ISSN
0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006892172
Cited by
125
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
Keywords
EEG complexity, brain development, correlation dimension, Lyapunov exponents, nonlinear dynamics, brain maturation, resting-state EEG, children, neonates, regional brain differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Child, Child, Preschool, Electroencephalography, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review