The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A normative study of the maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT)
Open accessAbstract
The maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) is a daytime polysomnographic procedure which quantifies wake tendency by measuring the ability to remain awake during soporific circumstances. We present normative data based on 64 healthy subjects (27 males and 37 females) who adhered to uniform MWT procedural conditions including polysomnographic montage, illuminance level, seating position, room temperature, meal timing, and subject instructions. When allowed a maximum trial duration of 40 min, subjects' mean sleep latency to the first epoch of sustained sleep was 35.2 +/- 7.9 min. The lower normal limit, defined as two standard deviations below the mean, was 19.4 min. Calculation of data on the basis of a maximum trial duration of 20 min and sleep latency to the first appearance of brief sleep (a microsleep episode or one epoch of any stage of sleep) yielded a mean sleep latency of 18.1 +/- 3.6 min and a lower normal limit of 10.9 min. Sleep latency scores were significantly higher than those previously reported in patients with disorders of excessive somnolence. Therefore, the MWT appears to be a useful procedure in differentiating groups with normal daytime wake tendency from those with impaired wake tendency and in identifying individuals with pathologic inability to remain awake under soporific circumstances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Littner, M. R., Kushida, C., Wise, M., G. Davila, D., Morgenthaler, T., Lee-Chiong, T., Hirshkowitz, M., Loube, D. L., Bailey, D., Berry, R. B., et al. (2005) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/28.1.113 · Cited by 1,142
Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: physiological basis and measurement
Oken, B. S., Salinsky, M. C., & Elsas, S. M. (2006) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.017 · Cited by 887
Jenkinson, C., Davies, R. J., Mullins, R., & Stradling, J. R. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)10532-9 · Cited by 826
Distinguishing sleepiness and fatigue: focus on definition and measurement
Shen, J., Barbera, J., & Shapiro, C. M. (2006) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2005.05.004 · Cited by 687
Self-citationKushida, C. A., Nichols, D. A., Holmes, T. H., Quan, S. F., Walsh, J. K., Gottlieb, D. J., Simon, R. D., Guilleminault, C., White, D. P., Goodwin, J. L., et al. (2012) · Sleep · doi:10.5665/sleep.2226 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Doghramji, K., Mitler, M. M., Sangal, R. B., Shapiro, C., Taylor, S., Walsleben, J., Belisle, C., Erman, M. K., Hayduk, R., Hosn, R., B. O'Malley, E., Sangal, J. M., Schutte, S. L., & Youakim, J. M.
- Venue
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 554-562
- ISSN
- 0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111766101
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A normative study of the maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00010-2
- The paper
- Doghramji, K., Mitler, M. M., Sangal, R. B., Shapiro, C., Taylor, S., Walsleben, J., Belisle, C., Erman, M. K., Hayduk, R., Hosn, R., B. O'Malley, E., Sangal, J. M., Schutte, S. L., & Youakim, J. M. (1997). A normative study of the maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT). Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00010-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.