The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0626 · Cited by 4,674
Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory
Mesulam, M. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410280502 · Cited by 2,684
Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man
Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(75)90263-1 · Cited by 2,088
Dale, A. M., & Sereno, M. I. (1993) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.162 · Cited by 2,003
Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time
Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.887923 · Cited by 1,714
Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory Volume 2
(1978) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2571-0 · Cited by 1,362
A Metric for Thought: A Comparison of P300 Latency and Reaction Time
McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7444452 · Cited by 1,147
Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man
Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(75)90003-6 · Cited by 1,012
Selemon, L., & Goldman-Rakic, P. (1988) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.08-11-04049.1988 · Cited by 907
Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man
Knight, R. T. (1984) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(84)90016-9 · Cited by 828
Cited by
Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b
Polich, J. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019 · Cited by 7,919
Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.-P. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018 · Cited by 2,573
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026 · Cited by 2,644
Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain
Quiroga, R. Q., Reddy, L., Kreiman, G., Koch, C., & Fried, I. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03687 · Cited by 1,988
On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity
Kok, A. (2001) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577201990559 · Cited by 1,766
Metadata
- Authors
- Halgren, E., Marinkovic, K., & Chauvel, P.
- Venue
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 156-164
- ISSN
- 0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058498782
- Cited by
- 640
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 13.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00119-3
- The paper
- Halgren, E., Marinkovic, K., & Chauvel, P. (1998). Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00119-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
