Cited by 500Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Electrophysiological correlates of sleep delta waves

Amzica, F., Steriade, M.·1998·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Recent studies have disclosed several oscillations occurring during resting sleep within the frequency range of the classical delta band (0.5-4 Hz). There are at least 3 oscillations with distinct mechanisms and sites of origin: a slow (<1 Hz) cortically-generated oscillation, a clock-like thalamic oscillation (1-4 Hz), and a cortical oscillation (1-4 Hz). The present paper reviews data on these oscillations and the possible mechanisms which coalesce them into the polymorphic waves of slow wave sleep. Data stem from intracellular (over 500 single cell and 50 double impalements) and field potentials recorded from the cortex and thalamus of cats (120 animals) under ketamine and xylazine anesthesia. Other experiments were based on whole night EEG recordings from humans (5 subjects). The frequency of the slow oscillation both in anesthetized animals and in naturally sleeping humans ranged between 0.1 and 1 Hz (89% of the cases being between 0.5 and 0.9 Hz). The slow (<1 Hz) oscillation is reflected in the EEG as rhythmic sequences of surface-negative waves (associated with hyperpolarizations of deeply-lying neurons) and surface-positive K-complexes (representing excitation in large pools of cortical neurons). Through its long-range synchronization, the slow oscillation has the ability to trigger and to group thalamically-generated spindles and two delta (1-4 Hz) oscillations. Finally, it is argued that the analysis of the electroencephalogram should transcend the spectral analyse…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00051-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Virtually every cortical neuron, both excitatory and inhibitory, engages in the slow oscillation with firing patterns showing high synchrony across cellular populations.

    “Virtually every cortical neuron, both excitatory as well as inhibitory neuron, engages in the slow oscillation with the firing patterns showing high synchrony across cellular populations (33,188,1139,1146,1261,1268).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [33]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 500

Authors
Amzica, F., & Steriade, M.
Affiliations
Université Laval (CA)
Venue
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-04
Volume
107
Issue
2
Pages
69-83
ISSN
0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006732462
Cited by
500
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
sleep slow waves, delta oscillations, slow oscillations, K-complexes, sleep spindles, cortical synchronization, thalamus, cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Delta Rhythm, Humans, Periodicity, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review