Electrophysiological correlates of sleep delta waves
Abstract
Recent studies have disclosed several oscillations occurring during resting sleep within the frequency range of the classical delta band (0.5-4 Hz). There are at least 3 oscillations with distinct mechanisms and sites of origin: a slow (<1 Hz) cortically-generated oscillation, a clock-like thalamic oscillation (1-4 Hz), and a cortical oscillation (1-4 Hz). The present paper reviews data on these oscillations and the possible mechanisms which coalesce them into the polymorphic waves of slow wave sleep. Data stem from intracellular (over 500 single cell and 50 double impalements) and field potentials recorded from the cortex and thalamus of cats (120 animals) under ketamine and xylazine anesthesia. Other experiments were based on whole night EEG recordings from humans (5 subjects). The frequency of the slow oscillation both in anesthetized animals and in naturally sleeping humans ranged between 0.1 and 1 Hz (89% of the cases being between 0.5 and 0.9 Hz). The slow (<1 Hz) oscillation is reflected in the EEG as rhythmic sequences of surface-negative waves (associated with hyperpolarizations of deeply-lying neurons) and surface-positive K-complexes (representing excitation in large pools of cortical neurons). Through its long-range synchronization, the slow oscillation has the ability to trigger and to group thalamically-generated spindles and two delta (1-4 Hz) oscillations. Finally, it is argued that the analysis of the electroencephalogram should transcend the spectral analyse…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Virtually every cortical neuron, both excitatory and inhibitory, engages in the slow oscillation with firing patterns showing high synchrony across cellular populations.
“Virtually every cortical neuron, both excitatory as well as inhibitory neuron, engages in the slow oscillation with the firing patterns showing high synchrony across cellular populations (33,188,1139,1146,1261,1268).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [33]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 500
- Authors
- Amzica, F., & Steriade, M.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- ORCID
- Amzica, F.
- Venue
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 69-83
- ISSN
- 0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006732462
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 8.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Keywords
- sleep slow waves, delta oscillations, slow oscillations, K-complexes, sleep spindles, cortical synchronization, thalamus, cortex
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Delta Rhythm, Humans, Periodicity, Sleep
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review