The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessing the accuracy of topographic EEG mapping for determining local brain function
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There has been considerable discussion regarding the accuracy of topographic electroencephalographic (EEG) maps for assessing local cerebral function. We performed this study to test the accuracy of EEG mapping by examining the association between electrical activity and the perfusion under each electrode as another measure of local cerebral function. METHODS EEG mapping was performed simultaneously with (H15)2O positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in 6 normal adult subjects, both at rest and during a simple motor task. EEG data were processed using 3 different montages; two EEG power measures (absolute and relative power) were examined. RESULTS Relative power had much stronger associations with perfusion than did absolute power. In addition, calculating power for bipolar electrode pairs and averaging power over electrode pairs sharing a common electrode yielded stronger associations with perfusion than data from referential or single source montages. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate (1) that topographic EEG mapping can accurately reflect local brain function in a way that is comparable to other methods, and (2) that the choice of EEG measure and montage have a significant influence on the degree with which maps reflect this local activity and function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of mental fatigue on attention: An ERP study
Boksem, M. A. S., Meijman, T. F., & Lorist, M. M. (2005) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.011 · Cited by 1,088
What does the prefrontal cortex “do” in affect: perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research
Davidson, R. J. (2004) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.008 · Cited by 992
Depression, anxiety, and resting frontal EEG asymmetry: A meta-analytic review.
Thibodeau, R., Jorgensen, R. S., & Kim, S. (2006) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.115.4.715 · Cited by 620
Harmon-Jones, E. (2004) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.003 · Cited by 414
Changes in Brain Function of Depressed Subjects During Treatment With Placebo
Leuchter, A. F., Cook, I. A., Witte, E. A., Morgan, M., & Abrams, M. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.1.122 · Cited by 396
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, I. A., O'Hara, R., Uijtdehaage, S. H. J., Mandelkern, M., & Leuchter, A. F.
- Venue
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 408-414
- ISSN
- 0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158726522
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the accuracy of topographic EEG mapping for determining local brain function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00092-3
- The paper
- Cook, I. A., O'Hara, R., Uijtdehaage, S. H. J., Mandelkern, M., & Leuchter, A. F. (1998). Assessing the accuracy of topographic EEG mapping for determining local brain function. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00092-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.