The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changes in Brain Function of Depressed Subjects During Treatment With Placebo
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It has been proposed that 50%-75% of the efficacy of antidepressant medication represents the placebo effect, since many depressed patients improve when treated with either medication or placebo. This study examined brain function in depressed subjects receiving either active medication or placebo and sought to determine whether quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) could detect differences in brain function between medication and placebo responders. Both QEEG power and cordance, a new measure that reflects cerebral perfusion and is sensitive to the effect of antidepressant medication, were examined. METHOD: Fifty-one subjects with major depression were enrolled in one of two independent, 9-week double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in which either fluoxetine (N=24) or venlafaxine (N=27) was the active medication. Serial QEEG recordings were performed during the course of treatment. After 9 weeks, the blind was broken and subjects were classified as medication responders, placebo responders, medication nonresponders, or placebo nonresponders. RESULTS: No significant pretreatment differences in clinical or QEEG measures were found among the four outcome groups. Placebo responders, however, showed a significant increase in prefrontal cordance starting early in treatment that was not seen in medication responders (who showed decreased cordance) or in medication nonresponders or placebo nonresponders (who showed no significant change). There was no significant change in QEEG power during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that "effective" placebo treatment induces changes in brain function that are distinct from those associated with antidepressant medication. If these results are confirmed, cordance may be useful for differentiating between medication and placebo responders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
Subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in mood disorders
Drevets, W. C., Price, J. L., Simpson, J. R., Todd, R. D., Reich, T., Vannier, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386824a0 · Cited by 2,693
Is the Placebo Powerless?: An Analysis of Clinical Trials Comparing Placebo with No Treatment
Hróbjartsson, A., & Gøtzsche, P. C. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105243442106 · Cited by 1,503
Baxter, L. R. (1985) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790280019002 · Cited by 603
The DST as a predictor of outcome in depression: a meta-analysis
Ribeiro, S. C. M., Tandon, R., Grunhaus, L., & Greden, J. F. (1993) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.150.11.1618 · Cited by 329
Assessing the accuracy of topographic EEG mapping for determining local brain function
Cook, I. A., O'Hara, R., Uijtdehaage, S. H. J., Mandelkern, M., & Leuchter, A. F. (1998) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00092-3 · Cited by 297
Self-citationRegional Cerebral Blood Flow in Mood Disorders, III: Treatment and Clinical Response
Nobler, M. S. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950110044007 · Cited by 255
The Powerful Placebo: From Ancient Priest to Modern Physician
Shapiro, A. K., & Shapiro, E. (1997) · Cited by 246
CHANGES IN BRAIN FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY IN ALZHEIMER-TYPE AND MULTI-INFARCT DEMENTIA
LEUCHTER, A. F., NEWTON, T. F., COOK, I. A., WALTER, D. O., ROSENBERG-THOMPSON, S., & LACHENBRUCH, P. A. (1992) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/115.5.1543 · Cited by 229
Self-citation(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 226
Cited by
A Comprehensive Review of the Placebo Effect: Recent Advances and Current Thought
Price, D. D., Finniss, D. G., & Benedetti, F. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.113006.095941 · Cited by 1,146
The neuroscience of placebo effects: connecting context, learning and health
Wager, T. D., & Atlas, L. Y. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3976 · Cited by 844
Benedetti, F., Pollo, A., Lopiano, L., Lanotte, M., Vighetti, S., & Rainero, I. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-10-04315.2003 · Cited by 788
The placebo response in medicine: minimize, maximize or personalize?
Enck, P., Bingel, U., Schedlowski, M., & Rief, W. (2013) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3923 · Cited by 671
When words are painful: unraveling the mechanisms of the nocebo effect
Benedetti, F., Lanotte, M., Lopiano, L., & Colloca, L. (2007) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.02.020 · Cited by 636
Metadata
- Authors
- Leuchter, A. F., Cook, I. A., Witte, E. A., Morgan, M., & Abrams, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 122-129
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2107984515
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 13.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in Brain Function of Depressed Subjects During Treatment With Placebo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.1.122
- The paper
- Leuchter, A. F., Cook, I. A., Witte, E. A., Morgan, M., & Abrams, M. (2002). Changes in Brain Function of Depressed Subjects During Treatment With Placebo. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.1.122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.