The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of mineral population by index particle: Implication for the Stanton hypothesis
Abstract
Fibers from seven crocidolite samples used by M. F. Stanton et al. (J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 67, 965-975 (1981] were measured from STEM and optical images. Their masses were computed. From these data, the population was normalized to a sample mass of 1 micrograms, and the number of fibers in various size categories of a 1-microgram sample was compared to the tumor probability for each sample. The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate errors in and the utility of population characterization by index number (log of the number of particles longer than 8 micron with widths equal to or less than 0.25 micron) and (2) to review the Stanton hypothesis in view of this analysis. The study found that in most cases the index number is a reliable population parameter. However, index numbers between 0 and 2.5 cannot be obtained. Therefore, populations of mineral fibers will fall into two groups: those without index particles, which have indeterminant index numbers, and those with index numbers between 2.5 and 6.0. Within Stanton's populations that contain index particles, where y equals logit tumor probability and x equals index number, r equals 0.307 (insignificant). Where y equals tumor probability and x equals index number, r equals 0.503 (significant). The correlation coefficients are low enough to suggest the possibility that factors other than size and shape play a role in mineral fiber carcinogenicity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Wylie et al. [62] also found that the correlation was better between the probability of tumor formation and the number of fibers > 8 μm in length and ≤ 0.25 μm in diameter than between logit(p) (defined in Table 2) and number of fibers.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [62]
In the citing paper
“Wylie et al. [62] found that for samples containing a low number of fibers > 8 μm in length and ≤ 0.25 μm in diameter, the correlation coefficient was low enough to suggest that other parameters (other categories of size, shape or other factors) may play a role in carcinogenicity.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [62]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Chamberlain, 1978, The cytotoxic effects of asbestos and other mineral dusts in tissue culture cell line, Brit. J. Exp. Pathol., 59, 183
- Stanton, 1981, Relation of particle dimension to carcinogenicity in amphibole asbestosis and other fibrous minerals, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 67, 965
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boulanger, G., Andujar, P., Pairon, J.-C., Billon-Galland, M.-A., Dion, C., Dumortier, P., Brochard, P., Sobaszek, A., Bartsch, P., Paris, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-13-59 · Cited by 176
Role of Mutagenicity in Asbestos Fiber-Induced Carcinogenicity and Other Diseases
Huang, S. X. L., Jaurand, M.-C., Kamp, D. W., Whysner, J., & Hei, T. K. (2011) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2011.556051 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Wylie, A. G., Virta, R. L., & Segreti, J. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 427-439
- ISSN
- 0013-9351
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of mineral population by index particle: Implication for the Stanton hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0013-9351(87)80043-9
- The paper
- Wylie, A. G., Virta, R. L., & Segreti, J. M. (1987). Characterization of mineral population by index particle: Implication for the Stanton hypothesis. Environmental Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-9351(87)80043-9