Cited by 63Ginseng Biological Effects and ApplicationsIon channel regulation and functionIon Transport and Channel Regulation

Voltage-dependent inhibition of brain Na (+) channels by American ginseng

Liu, Dong, Li, Bei, Liu, Yi, Attele, Anoja S., Kyle, John W., Yuan, Chun-Su·2001·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) is a major species of ginseng that has many pharmacological effects. Studies have demonstrated that constituents of ginseng have neuroprotective effects during ischemia. Neuronal damage during ischemic episodes has been associated with abnormal Na(+) fluxes. Drugs that block voltage-dependent Na(+) channels provide cytoprotection during cerebral ischemia. We thus hypothesized that American ginseng may block Na(+) channels. In this study, effects of an American ginseng aqueous extract was evaluated in tsA201 cells transfected with cDNA expressing alpha subunits of the Brain(2a) Na(+) channel using the whole-cell patch clamp technique. We found that American ginseng extract tonically and reversibly blocked the channel in a concentration- and voltage-dependent manner. It shifted the voltage-dependence of inactivation by 14 mV (3 mg/ml) in the hyperpolarizing direction and delayed recovery from inactivation, whereas activation of the channel was unaffected. Ginsenoside Rb(1), a major constituent of the American ginseng extract, produced similar effects. The data were compared with the actions of lidocaine, a Na(+) channel blocker. Our results suggest that Na(+) channel block by American ginseng extract and Rb(1) was primarily due to interaction with the inactive state of the channel. Inhibition of the Na(+) channel activity by American ginseng extract may contribute to its neuroprotective effect during ischemia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)00735-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 63

Authors
Liu, D., Li, B., Liu, Y., Attele, A. S., Kyle, J. W., & Yuan, C.-S.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Yuan, Chun-Su
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
413
Issue
1
Pages
47-54
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103047172
Cited by
63
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
Keywords
Panax quinquefolius, voltage-gated sodium channels, sodium channel blockade, ginsenoside Rb1, neuroprotection, cerebral ischemia, channel inactivation, recovery from inactivation, lidocaine, tsA201 cells
MeSH terms
Brain, Cell Line, Central Nervous System Agents, Electric Conductivity, Panax, Humans, Kinetics, Lidocaine, Plant Extracts, Plants, Medicinal, Saponins, Sodium, Transfection, Sodium Channels, Ion Channel Gating, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Sodium Channel Blockers, Ginsenosides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review