Cited by 72Coagulation and Flocculation StudiesPolymer Synthesis and CharacterizationMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

Effective polyelectrolytes synthesised from expanded polystyrene wastes

Bajdur, Wioletta, Pajączkowska, Justyna, Makarucha, Beata, Sułkowska, Anna, Sułkowski, Wiesław W.·2002·European Polymer Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0014-3057(01)00191-4

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bajdur, W., Pajączkowska, J., Makarucha, B., Sułkowska, A., & Sułkowski, W. W.
Affiliations
University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Corresponding author
Sułkowski, Wiesław W.
Venue
European Polymer Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
299-304
ISSN
0014-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984657983
Cited by
72
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Polymer Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Keywords
expanded polystyrene waste, polyelectrolyte synthesis, anionic polyelectrolytes, flocculation, coal mine water treatment, industrial water treatment, turbidity removal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review