The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rab4 affects both recycling and degradative endosomal trafficking
Abstract
The small GTPases Rab4, Rab5 and Rab7 are endosomal proteins which play important roles in the regulation of various stages of endosomal trafficking. Rab4 and Rab5 have both been localized to early endosomes and have been shown to control recycling and endosomal fusion, respectively. Rab7, a marker of the late endosomal compartment, is involved in the regulation of the late endocytic pathway. Here, we compare the role of Rab4, Rab5 and Rab7 in early and late endosomal trafficking in HeLa cells monitoring ligand uptake, recycling and degradation. Expression of the Rab4 dominant negative mutant (Rab4AS22N) leads to a significant reduction in both recycling and degradation while, as expected, Rab7 mutants exclusively affect epidermal growth factor (EGF) and low density lipoprotein degradation. As also expected, expression of the dominant negative Rab5 mutant perturbs internalization kinetics and affects both recycling and degradation. Expression of Rab4WT and dominant positive mutant (Rab4AQ67L) changes dramatically the morphology of the transferrin compartment leading to the formation of membrane tubules. These transferrin positive tubules display swellings (varicosities) some of which are positive for early endosomal antigen‐1 and contain EGF. We propose that the Rab4GTPase is important for the function of the early sorting endosomal compartment, affecting trafficking along both recycling and degradative pathways.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Expression of a dominant-negative RAB4 construct alters both endocytic recycling and degradation events.
“For example, expression of a dominant-negative RAB4 construct alters both endocytic recyling and degradation events [64]”
From Distinct Roles for RAB10 and RAB29 in Pathogenic LRRK2-Mediated Endolysosomal Trafficking Alterations (2020) · cites this paper as [64]
The accumulation of EGF in a RAB4-positive recycling compartment upon pathogenic LRRK2 expression or RNAi of either RAB8A or RAB10 reflects a crosstalk between recycling and degradative trafficking pathways.
“The accumulation of EGF in a RAB4-positive recycling compartment upon pathogenic LRRK2 expression or RNAi of either RAB8A or RAB10 reflects a crosstalk between recycling and degradative trafficking pathways, which has been described before [64,65,66].”
From Distinct Roles for RAB10 and RAB29 in Pathogenic LRRK2-Mediated Endolysosomal Trafficking Alterations (2020) · cites this paper as [64]
Citations
Cites
Daro, E., van der Sluijs, P., Galli, T., & Mellman, I. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.18.9559 · Cited by 343
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- 10.1152/physrev.1997.77.3.759 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.cb.09.110193.001021 · DOI
- 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80013-1 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.575 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.128.4.549 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.125.6.1265 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90414-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/372055a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00051-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61608-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/8967 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-4889(98)00050-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80025-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0955-0674(91)90033-U · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/bi00233a001 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.88.14.6313 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90307-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90316-Q · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90306-W · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06381.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70018-1 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.135.4.913 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.151.6.1207 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90369-P · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05701.x · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.108.11.3349 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.131.6.1435 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.272.7.4391 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.11.2.467 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.271.46.29191 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/17.7.1941 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.84.23.8210 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00843-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00477-Q · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/16.1.15 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.270.22.13503 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.112.24.4773 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1083/jcb.149.4.901 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19970901)29:1<41::AID-CYTO4>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
- 10.1042/bj3460593 · DOI
- Li L., 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 3, 3
- 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1637 · DOI
- Bielli A. Thörnqvist P.O. Hendrick A.G. Finn R. Fitzgerald K. and McCaffrey M.W. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. in press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mitchell, H., Choudhury, A., Pagano, R. E., & Leof, E. B. (2004) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e04-03-0245 · Cited by 215
Exosomes in cancer: Use them or target them?
Bastos, N., Ruivo, C. F., da Silva, S., & Melo, S. A. (2018) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.08.009 · Cited by 140
Rivero-Ríos, P., Romo-Lozano, M., Fernández, B., Fdez, E., & Hilfiker, S. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9071719 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- McCaffrey, M. W., Bielli, A., Cantalupo, G., Mora, S., Roberti, V., Santillo, M., Drummond, F., & Bucci, C.
- Venue
- FEBS Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04-19
- Volume
- 495
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 21-30
- ISSN
- 0014-5793
- 1873-3468
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review