Cited by 12Ovarian function and disordersReproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive Health and Technologies

Aromatase Inhibition Improves Ovarian Response to FSH: A Potential Option for Low Responders During Ovarian Stimulation.

Open access
Mitwally, M.F., Casper, R.F.·2001·Fertility and Sterility

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01717-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitwally, M. F., & Casper, R. F.
Affiliations
Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-04
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
S8-S9
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976803676
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
letrozole, aromatase inhibitors, poor ovarian responders, FSH stimulation, intrauterine insemination, unexplained infertility, estrogen negative feedback, estradiol, mature follicles, gonadotropin dose reduction, hCG trigger, clomiphene citrate, growth hormone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review