The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis
Open accessAbstract
Objective To compare the diagnostic potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.Design Double blind set-up.Setting University medical school.Patient(s) We studied 106 consecutive premenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for benign reasons.Intervention(s) Transvaginal ultrasonography and MRI were compared with histopathologic examination as the golden standard.Main outcome measure(s) Adenomyosis.Result(s) Twenty-two (21%) patients had adenomyosis. The sensitivity and specificity were as follows: sensitivity: MRI 0.70 (0.46-0.87) and TVS 0.68 (0.44-0.86) (P=.66); specificity: MRI 0.86 (0.76-0.93) and TVS 0.65 (0.50-0.77) (P=.03). The combination of MRI and TVS was most sensitive (0.89 [0.64-0.98]), but produced the lowest specificity (0.60 [0.44-0.73]). Adenomyosis was not detected by either MRI or TVS at uterine volumes >400 mL. Exclusion of uteri >400 mL from the analysis improved the diagnostic precision of MRI, but not that of TVS. The diagnostic accuracy at MRI was improved by calculating the maximum difference between the thinnest and thickest junctional zone (JZdif) (i.e., > or =5-7 mm).Conclusion(s) Magnetic resonance imaging was superior to TVS for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Magnetic resonance imaging had a higher specificity than TVS, but their sensitivities were in line. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI, as that of TVS, was at an intermediate level, but the diagnostic accuracy of the former improved by exclusion of uteri >400 mL. The combination of MRI and TVS produced the highest level of accuracy for exclusion of adenomyosis, but the low specificity may necessitate further investigation of positive findings. Measurement of the difference in junctional zone thickness may optimize the diagnosis of adenomyosis at MRI.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is a significant association of pelvic endometriosis with uterine adenomyosis in women and in the baboon with life-long infertility.”
From The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis, tissue injury and repair (2009) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation.
Reinhold, C., MCCARTHY, S. M., Bret, P. M., Mehio, A. R., Atri, M., Zakarian, R., Glaude, Y., Liang, L., & Seymour, R. J. (1996) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633139 · Cited by 417
Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography.
Ascher, S. M., Arnold, L. L., Patt, R. H., Schruefer, J. J. P., Bagley, A. S., Semelka, R. C., Zeman, R. K., & Simon, J. A. (1994) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115630 · Cited by 265
Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging.
Togashi, K., Ozasa, H., Konishi, I., Itoh, H., Nishimura, K., Fujisawa, I., Noma, S., Sagoh, T., Minami, S., & Yamashita, K. (1989) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.171.2.2704819 · Cited by 253
Treatment of adenomyosis-associated menorrhagia with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device
Fedele, L., Bianchi, S., Raffaelli, R., Portuese, A., & Dorta, M. (1997) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00245-8 · Cited by 242
Uterine junctional zone, function and disease
Brosens, J. J., de Souza, N. M., & Barker, F. G. (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91387-4 · Cited by 215
Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis
Fedele, L., Bianchi, S., Dorta, M., Arcaini, L., Zanotti, F., & Cannelli, S. G. (1992) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55142-5 · Cited by 191
Adenomyosis and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with MR imaging.
Mark, A. S., Hricak, H., Heinrichs, L., Hendrickson, M. R., Winkler, M. L., Bachica, J. A., & Stickler, J. E. (1987) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.163.2.3562836 · Cited by 185
Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography.
Reinhold, C., Atri, M., Mehio, A. R., Zakarian, R., Aldis, A. E., & Bret, P. M. (1995) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480727 · Cited by 178
Kunz, G., Beil, D., Huppert, P., & Leyendecker, G. (2000) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/15.1.76 · Cited by 177
Surgery: Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: a study on frequency distribution and patient characteristics
Vercellini, P., Parazzini, F., Oldani, S., Panazza, S., Bramante, T., & Crosignani, P. G. (1995) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136111 · Cited by 175
Myometrial zonal differentiation and uterine junctional zone hyperplasia in the non-pregnant uterus
Brosens, J. J. (1998) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/4.5.496 · Cited by 148
Brosens, J. J., de Souza, N. M., Barker, F. G., Paraschos, T., & Winston, R. M. L. (1995) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11320.x · Cited by 127
Uterine junctional zone: correlation between histologic findings and MR imaging.
Brown, H. K., Stoll, B., Nicosia, S. V., Fiorica, J. V., Hambley, P. S., Clarke, L. P., & Silbiger, M. L. (1991) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.179.2.1707545 · Cited by 125
Hysteroscopic myometrial biopsy: Its use in diagnosing adenomyosis and its clinical application
McCausland, A. M. (1992) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91551-8 · Cited by 119
Pathology in Gynecology and Obstetrics,
Compel, C., Silverberg, S. G., & Kraus, F. T. (1995) · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/00000478-199512000-00017 · Cited by 111
Long-term management of adenomyosis with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist: a case report
Nelson, J. R., & Corson, S. L. (1993) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55704-5 · Cited by 110
The response of adenomyosis to endometrial ablation/resection
McCausland, V. M. (1998) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/4.4.350 · Cited by 107
Transvaginal ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of adenomyoma versus leiomyoma
Fedele, L., Bianchi, S., Dorta, M., Zanotti, F., Brioschi, D., & Carinelli, S. G. (1992) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91558-0 · Cited by 103
Likelihood ratios for continuous test results—making the clinicians' job easier or harder?
Simel, D. L., Samsa, G. P., & Matchar, D. B. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90012-p · Cited by 77
Transvaginal ultrasonography versus uterine needle biopsy in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis
Vercellini, P., Cortesi, I., Giorgi, O. D., Merlo, D., Carinelli, S. G., & Crosignani, P. G. (1998) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/13.10.2884 · Cited by 75
The potential value of magnetic resonance imaging in infertility
de Souza, N. M., Brosens, J. J., Schwieso, J. E., Paraschos, T., & Winston, R. M. L. (1995) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/s0009-9260(05)82983-6 · Cited by 70
Transvaginal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Diffuse Adenomyosis
Atzori, E., Tronci, C., & Sionis, L. (2010) · Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · doi:10.1159/000291887 · Cited by 57
Embryonic heart rate in early pregnancy
Stefos, T., Lolis, D. E., Sotiriadis, A., & Ziakas, G. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Ultrasound · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199801)26:1 · Cited by 40
Differentiation between adenomyoma and leiomyoma with transvaginal ultrasonography
Huang, R., Chou, C. ‐., Chang, C., Yu, C., Huang, S., & Yao, B. L. (1995) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05010047.x · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Haines TJ, Tailor HB. Obstetrics and Gynecologic Pathology. 4th Ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1995:613–5.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Munro, M. G., Critchley, H., Broder, M. S., Fraser, I. S., & for the FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders (2011) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.011 · Cited by 1,728
den Bosch, T. V., Dueholm, M., Leone, F. P., Valentin, L., Rasmussen, C. K., Votino, A., Schoubroeck, D. V., Landolfo, C., Installé, A., Guerriero, S., et al. (2015) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.14806 · Cited by 776
Self-citationEtiology, symptomatology, and diagnosis of uterine myomas
Parker, W. H. (2007) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.093 · Cited by 731
“Focal, not well-demarcated, high-intensity or low-intensity areas in the myometrium also correlate with adenomyosis (70).”
BackgroundDiagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach
Chapron, C., Vannuccini, S., Santulli, P., Abrão, M. S., Carmona, F., Fraser, I. S., Gordts, S., Guo, S., Just, P., Noël, J., et al. (2020) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmz049 · Cited by 439
The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis, tissue injury and repair
Leyendecker, G., Wildt, L., & Mall, G. (2009) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1191-0 · Cited by 418
“the study population chosen and to the criteria applied to the interpretation of MRI Wndings [22–26].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Dueholm, M., Lundorf, E., Hansen, E. S., Sørensen, J. S., Ledertoug, S., & Olesen, F.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Dueholm, Margit
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 588-594
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966951938
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Keywords
- adenomyosis, magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal ultrasound, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, uterine volume, premenopausal women, hysterectomy, histopathological diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Double-Blind Method, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Myometrium, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Vagina, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Premenopause
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review