A prospective study of intrauterine insemination of processed sperm from men with oligoasthenospermia in superovulated women
Open accessAbstract
The effectiveness of intrauterine insemination (IUI) was compared with that of intracervical insemination (ICI) in 49 infertile couples, in whom the major cause for infertility was oligoasthenospermia. All women had ovulation stimulated with either a clomiphene citrate (CC)-human gonadotropin combination or human gonadotropins alone. The ovulatory dose of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was given after adequate estradiol levels were reached. The timing of inseminations was standardized--IUI was 28 hours after hCG and ICI was immediately after hCG administration. Only one insemination per month was performed with either IUI or ICI. The first treatment cycle was assigned randomly to be either IUI or ICI, and subsequent inseminations were alternated. A total of 182 cycles were completed, with 96 IUIs and 86 ICIs. Pregnancy occurred in eight patients, seven with IUI (14.3%) and one with ICI (2.0%); the difference is significant at P less than 0.05. The pregnancy rate per treatment cycle was 7.3% versus 1.2% (P less than 0.001). This study supports the use of IUI with processed sperm in the treatment of infertility due to oligoasthenospermia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies have limited their investigation to sperm quality after processing for IUI.
“Recent studies have limited their investigation to sperm quality after processing for IUI (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23).”
From Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm (1999) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Sequential clomiphene citrate-menotropin therapy for induction or enhancement of ovulation
Kemmann, E., & Jones, J. R. (1983) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47116-5 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dickey, R. P., Pyrzak, R., Lu, P. Y., Taylor, S. N., & Rye, P. H. (1999) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00519-6 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cruz, R. I., Kemmann, E., Brandeis, V. T., Becker, K. A., Beck, M., Beardsley, L., & Shelden, R.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1986-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 673-677
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2411107460
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Keywords
- intrauterine insemination, intracervical insemination, oligoasthenozoospermia, male infertility, superovulation, clomiphene citrate, human gonadotropins, human chorionic gonadotropin, pregnancy rate, infertility treatment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Insemination, Artificial, Insemination, Artificial, Homologous, Male, Oligospermia, Ovulation Induction, Prospective Studies, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Superovulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review