Cited by 171Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive System and PregnancyReproductive Biology and Fertility

Relationship of endometrial thickness and pattern to fecundity in ovulation induction cycles: effect of clomiphene citrate alone and with human menopausal gonadotropin

Open access
Dickey, Richard P., Olar, Terry T., Taylor, Steven N., Curole, David N., Matulich, Ellen M.·1993·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To determine if preovulation endometrial thickness or pattern are related to fecundity and to use of clomiphene citrate (CC) or hMG in IUI.Design Prospective ultrasound evaluation the day of hCG after CC alone (n = 197), hMG alone (n = 49), concurrent hMG or sequential CC and hMG (n = 205), and no medications (n = 23).Setting Private fertility clinic.Patients Two hundred seventy-one patients undergoing 474 cycles of IUI.Main outcome measures Endometrial thickness, pattern, per cycle fecundity, and continuing pregnancy.Results Endometrial thickness was related to fecundity and continuing pregnancy. No pregnancies occurred when thickness was < 6 mm. The continuing pregnancy rate was 12.6% when thickness was > or = 9 mm, compared with 6.9% when thickness was 6 mm to 8 mm. Endometrial pattern was unrelated to pregnancy. Average endometrial thickness was decreased when hMG and CC were used in combination (7.9 mm) compared with hMG alone (9.4 mm). Endometrial thickness was negatively related to CC dose and positively related to the day of hCG administration by ANOVA.Conclusions Endometrial thickness the day of hCG administration is prognostic of fecundity and continuing pregnancy in cycles of ovulation induction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55855-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 171

Authors
Dickey, R. P., Olar, T. T., Taylor, S. N., Curole, D. N., & Matulich, E. M.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-04
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
756-760
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2419667164
Cited by
171
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, fecundity, ovulation induction, clomiphene citrate, human menopausal gonadotropin, intrauterine insemination, ongoing pregnancy, hCG administration timing, endometrial ultrasound
MeSH terms
Adult, Clomiphene, Endometrium, Female, Fertility, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Menotropins, Middle Aged, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review