Cited by 174Ovarian function and disordersReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

A randomized trial of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate in women undergoing superovulation

Open access
Al-Fozan, Haya, Al-Khadouri, Maha, Tan, Seang Lin, Tulandi, Togas·2004·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole (7.5 mg) and clomiphene citrate (CC; 100 mg) in women undergoing superovulation and IUI.Design Prospective randomized trial.Setting University teaching hospital.Patient(s) We studied a total of 238 cycles of superovulation and IUI in women with idiopathic infertility.Interventions Patients were randomized into treatment with 7.5 mg of letrozole daily (74 patients, 115 cycles) or 100 mg of CC daily (80 patients, 123 cycles).Main outcome measure(s) Number of follicles, endometrial thickness, pregnancy rate, and miscarriage rate.Result(s) The mean age, parity, and duration of infertility in both groups of patients were similar. There was no significant difference between the total number of developing follicles in the letrozole (5.7 +/- 3.7) and in the CC groups (4.8 +/- 2.5). The number of follicles of > or =14 mm and of >18 mm were 2.1 +/- 1.2 and 1.4 +/- 0.7 in the letrozole group, and 1.7 +/- 0.9 and 1.1 +/- 0.5 in the CC group, respectively. No difference was found in the endometrial thickness between the two groups (7.1 +/- 0.2 mm in the letrozole group, 8.2 +/- 5.9 mm in the CC group). The pregnancy rate per cycle was 11.5% in the letrozole group and 8.9% in the CC group. Four of the 11 pregnancies in the CC group resulted in a miscarriage (36.6%).Conclusion(s) Superovulation and IUI with letrozole and CC are associated with similar pregnancy rates, but the miscarriage rate is higher with CC. The ideal dose of letrozole remains unknown and further study is needed.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a randomized trial of 238 superovulation/IUI cycles, letrozole 7.5 mg and clomiphene citrate 100 mg produced similar pregnancy rates, but CC was associated with a higher miscarriage rate. The ideal letrozole dose remained unknown and further study was recommended.

Key findings

  • Pregnancy rate per cycle was 11.5% with letrozole and 8.9% with CC.
  • Miscarriage occurred in 4 of 11 CC pregnancies (36.6% in the abstract; 36.7% in the results) versus no miscarriages in the letrozole group; two ectopic pregnancies occurred with letrozole.
  • Total follicle numbers and endometrial thickness did not differ significantly between groups, but mature follicle counts were higher with letrozole: Table 2 reports follicles >14 mm as 2.0 ± 0.1 vs 1.7 ± 0.1 and dominant follicles as 1.3 ± 0.1 vs 1.1 ± 0.1.
  • Baseline age, parity, and duration of infertility were similar between groups.

Methods

  • Prospective randomized trial at a university teaching hospital (Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Center) from July 2002 to September 2003, including 238 superovulation/IUI cycles in women with idiopathic infertility; inclusion required infertility ≥1 year, patent tubes on hysterosalpingogram, and normal semen analysis.
  • Patients were randomized by computer-generated random table to letrozole 7.5 mg daily (74 patients, 115 cycles) or CC 100 mg daily (80 patients, 123 cycles) on days 3–7; hCG 10,000 U IM was given when the dominant follicle reached ≥18 mm, with IUI 24 and 48 hours later.
  • Outcomes were total follicles, endometrial thickness, pregnancy rate, and miscarriage rate; analysis used Student’s t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and a chi-square-type test for proportions, with P<.05 considered significant.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the ideal dose of letrozole remains unknown and that further study is needed; it also states that a larger study is needed to clarify why more mature follicles in the letrozole group did not produce a higher pregnancy rate.
  • Evident from the text: this was a small single-center trial with no blinding described, and the miscarriage comparison rests on small numbers (4/11 CC pregnancies vs 0/11 letrozole pregnancies).
  • Evident from the text: reported values are inconsistent across sections, including total follicle counts, endometrial thickness, and the CC miscarriage percentage.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.04.070

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 16 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    There was no significant difference in endometrial thickness between the letrozole and clomiphene citrate groups.

    “No difference was found in the endometrial thickness between the two groups (7.1 Ϯ 0.2 mm in the letrozole group, 8.2 Ϯ 5.9 mm in the CC group).”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “There was no significant difference in the endometrial thickness between the two groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There was no significant difference in the total number of developing follicles between the letrozole and clomiphene citrate groups.

    “There was no significant difference between the total number of developing follicles in the letrozole (5.7 Ϯ 3.7) and in the CC groups (4.8 Ϯ 2.5).”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “The total numbers of follicles during stimulation were similar between the two groups (5.5 Ϯ 0.4 in the letrozole group, 4.8 Ϯ 0.3 in the CC group).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The number of follicles >18 mm was significantly higher in the letrozole group than in the clomiphene citrate group.

    “The number of follicles of Ն14 mm and of Ͼ18 mm were 2.1 Ϯ 1.2 and 1.4 Ϯ 0.7 in the letrozole group, and 1.7 Ϯ 0.9 and 1.1 Ϯ 0.5 in the CC group, respectively.”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “The number of follicles Ն14 mm and Ͼ18 mm were significantly higher in the letrozole group (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The number of follicles ≥14 mm was significantly higher in the letrozole group than in the clomiphene citrate group.

    “The number of follicles of Ն14 mm and of Ͼ18 mm were 2.1 Ϯ 1.2 and 1.4 Ϯ 0.7 in the letrozole group, and 1.7 Ϯ 0.9 and 1.1 Ϯ 0.5 in the CC group, respectively.”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “The number of follicles Ն14 mm and Ͼ18 mm were significantly higher in the letrozole group (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The higher number of mature follicles in the letrozole group did not result in a higher pregnancy rate.

    “The higher number of mature follicles in the letrozole group did not result in a higher pregnancy rate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 7
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The miscarriage rate was higher in the clomiphene citrate group than in the letrozole group; 4 of 11 pregnancies (36.7%) in the CC group resulted in miscarriage, whereas no miscarriages occurred in the letrozole group.

    “Four of the 11 pregnancies in the CC group resulted in a miscarriage (36.6%).”
    • Also stated in: § T A B L E 2 · plain
      “miscarriage rate was higher in the CC group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The observed difference in miscarriage rate between clomiphene citrate and letrozole groups is not due to chance.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The pregnancy rate per cycle was 11.5% in the letrozole group and 8.9% in the clomiphene citrate group.

    “The pregnancy rate per cycle was 11.5% in the letrozole group and 8.9% in the CC group.”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “The pregnancy rate per cycle was 11.5% in the letrozole group and 8.9% in the CC group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Clomiphene citrate treatment is associated with a discrepancy between ovulation and conception rates, and a higher incidence of miscarriage than in the general population.

    “In addition, CC treatment is associated with a discrepancy between ovulation and conception rates, and the incidence of miscarriage is higher than in the general population (2)(3)(4)(5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [2] Franks, 1985, Ovulatory disorders in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, Clin Obstet Gynecol

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [3] Kistner, 1965, Induction of ovulation with clomiphene citrate (clomid), Obstet Gynecol Survey source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Rabau, 1967, Current concepts in the treatment of anovulation, Br Med J source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Letrozole doses of 2.5 mg and 5 mg have been tested and produced similar responses.

    “Two doses regimens have been tested (2.5 mg and 5 mg) with similar response (8,9).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [8] Mitwally, 2001, Use of aromatase inhibitor for ovulation induction in patients with an inadequate response to clomiphene citrate, Fertil Steril source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] Sammour A, Biljan MM, Tan SL, Tulandi T. Prospective randomized trial comparing the effects of letrozole and clomiphene citrate (CC) on follicular development, endometrial thickness and pregnancy rate in patients undergoing superovulation prior to intrauterine insemination [Abstract 291]. 57th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, October 20–25, 2001, Orlando, FL. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a prior study, letrozole (2.5 mg daily for 5 days) induced ovulation in 9 of 12 cycles and 3 of 12 women with inadequate response to clomiphene citrate conceived.

    “Mitwally and Casper (8) used letrozole (2.5 mg daily for 5 days) in 12 women with inadequate response to CC. Ovulation occurred in 9 of 12 cycles and 3 patients conceived.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Mitwally, 2001, Use of aromatase inhibitor for ovulation induction in patients with an inadequate response to clomiphene citrate, Fertil Steril source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Letrozole is an aromatase inhibitor that has been widely used in women with breast cancer.

    “Letrozole is an aromatase inhibitor that has been widely used in women with breast cancer (7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Pfister, 2001, Effect of age and single versus multiple doses, pharmacokinetic of letrozole (Femara) in breast cancer patients, Biopharm Drug Dispos source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Gonadotropin is associated with a higher risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and multiple pregnancies than clomiphene citrate.

    “However, it is associated with a higher risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and multiple pregnancies (6).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Kettel, 1993, Hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian response to clomiphene citrate in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, Fertil Steril source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Ultrasound examinations were performed by the same two ultrasonographers.

    “The ultrasound examination was done by the same two ultrasonographers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Randomization was performed using a computer-generated random table.

    “The randomization was done using a computer-generated random table.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
9 of 9
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The study had sufficient statistical power to detect a difference in pregnancy rates between letrozole and clomiphene citrate.

    “The pregnancy rate per cycle was 11.5% in the letrozole group and 8.9% in the CC group.”
    “Superovulation and IUI with letrozole and CC are associated with similar pregnancy rates, but the miscarriage rate is higher with CC.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The observed difference in miscarriage rate between clomiphene citrate and letrozole groups is not due to chance.

    “miscarriage rate was higher in the CC group.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a randomized trial of 238 cycles of superovulation in women with idiopathic infertility, pregnancy rates with 7.5 mg letrozole and 100 mg CC daily for 5 days were similar, but the miscarriage rate in the CC-treated cycles was higher.

    “In another randomized trial of 238 cycles of superovulation in women with idiopathic infertility (75), we compared 7.5 mg of letrozole and 100 mg of CC daily for 5 days.The pregnancy rates in both groups were similar, but the miscarriage rate in the CC-treated cycles was higher.”

    From A new era in ovulation induction (2006) · cites this paper as [75]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Total follicle counts differ between the abstract and results

    Major

    The abstract reports 5.7 ± 3.7 follicles for letrozole and 4.8 ± 2.5 for CC, while the results report 5.5 ± 0.4 and 4.8 ± 0.3 for the same groups.

  • CC endometrial-thickness variability differs between the abstract and table

    Minor

    The abstract gives 8.2 ± 5.9 mm for the CC group, whereas the table gives 8.2 ± 0.6 mm at hCG.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Fozan, H., Al-Khadouri, M., Tan, S. L., & Tulandi, T.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Tulandi, Togas
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
82
Issue
6
Pages
1561-1563
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086050129
Cited by
174
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
letrozole, clomiphene citrate, superovulation, intrauterine insemination, unexplained infertility, aromatase inhibitors, pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, folliculogenesis, endometrial thickness
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Letrozole, Adult, Clomiphene, Endometrium, Female, Fertility Agents, Female, Ovarian Follicle, Humans, Infertility, Female, Insemination, Artificial, Nitriles, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Superovulation, Triazoles, Ultrasonography, Incidence, Pregnancy Rate, Aromatase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review