Cited by 130Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

Predictive factors for early mortality after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Light, Victoria L., Slezak, Frederick A., Porter, Joel A., Gerson, Lowell W., McCord, Gary·1995·Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract

Background Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a safe access procedure for enteral nutrition. The purpose of this investigation is to identify predictive factors for early mortality after PEG. Methods A retrospective review of the hospital records of 416 patients undergoing PEG from June 1, 1989, through December 31, 1991, was conducted. Patient demographics, admitting diagnosis, indication for PEG, risk factors for early mortality, and cause and date of death were reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was used to develop a model to predict early mortality after PEG. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 30 months. Results The overall mortality rate in this review was 227 of 416 patients (54.6%). The 7- and 30-day case fatality rates were 39 of 416 (9.4%) and 97 of 416 (23.3%), respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that urinary tract infection (odds ratio (OR) = 3.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.45-6.43) and previous aspiration (OR = 6.86; 95% CI = 3.27-14.4) were predictive factors for death at 1 week after PEG. Patients who had both risk factors had a 48.4% probability of dying within 7 days after PEG insertion, whereas those who had no risk factors had a 4.3% probability of death. Urinary tract infection (OR = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.17-3.41), previous aspiration (OR = 3.62; 95% CI = 2.00-6.55), and age greater than 75 years (OR = 2.49; 95% CI = 1.47-4.21) were predictive factors for death at 1 month after PEG. Patients who had all three risk factors ha…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70132-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Survival after PEG insertion very much depends on the indication and selection of patients.

    “However, survival very much depends on the indication and selection of patients (132-137).”
  • Several risk factors for early mortality after PEG insertion were identified, e.g. dementia, urinary tract infection, previous aspiration and diabetes.

    “Several risk factors for early mortality after PEG insertion were identified, e.g.dementia, urinary tract infection, previous aspiration and diabetes (132-136, 149, 156-159).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Light, V. L., Slezak, F. A., Porter, J. A., Gerson, L. W., & McCord, G.
Venue
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-10
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
330-335
ISSN
0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064696652
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Keywords
percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, early mortality, risk factors, urinary tract infection, aspiration, enteral nutrition, case fatality rate, elderly patients, mortality prediction model
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Endoscopy, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Gastrostomy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review