The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernisation
Abstract
Ecological modernisation theory has been offered as a possible solution to the environmental problems currently facing advanced industrial countries. It suggests that regulation can help to solve environmental problems whilst at the same time making industry more competitive. In theory this can be achieved if regulation encourages the development and application of innovative technologies and production techniques. This paper examines the contribution that an understanding of innovation theory can make to this debate. An understanding of how innovation takes place suggests that to some extent regulation can achieve what is suggested by ecological modernisation theory. This is particularly the case if it helps companies to overcome the considerable barriers to innovation which prevent them from moving beyond control technologies to consider clean technologies, from complementing technological change with organisational change and from exploring the strategic as well as the operational opportunities for improvement. This argument is assessed empirically through an examination of the implementation and impact of integrated pollution control (IPC), as introduced in England and Wales as part of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. Here it is shown that there are examples of combined economic and environmental improvement in industry as a result of the implementation of IPC, particularly where pollution inspectors have helped to develop the capacity of regulated firms to respond to the regulation. However, it is also shown that IPC fails to fully establish the imperative for action on environmental issues. Thus, whilst encouraging technological and organisational changes, it fails to establish the environment as a strategic concern in industry and as a result it is unlikely to promote the radical innovations that are associated with ecological modernisation in the longer-term.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981
Cited by
Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · Cited by 2,762
Khan, S. A. R., Razzaq, A., Yu, Z., & Miller, S. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2853 · Cited by 404
RetractedGeng, Y., Zhu, Q., Doberstein, B., & Fujita, T. (2009) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.036 · Cited by 382
Park, J., Sarkis, J., & Wu, Z. (2010) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.001 · Cited by 375
Sustainable packaging for supply chain management in the circular economy: A review
Meherishi, L., Narayana, S. A., & Ranjani, K. S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.057 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, J., & Gouldson, A.
- Venue
- Geoforum
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-44
- ISSN
- 0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080280841
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernisation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0016-7185(99)00042-1
- The paper
- Murphy, J., & Gouldson, A. (2000). Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernisation. Geoforum. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7185(99)00042-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.