Cited by 105

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A comparison of two methods used to evaluate thermal conductivity for some soils

Abu-Hamdeh, N.H, Khdair, A.I, Reeder, R.C·2001·International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0017-9310(00)00144-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bristow, 1994, Measurement of soil thermal properties with a dual-probe heat-pulse technique, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 1288, 10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050002x · DOI
  2. Campbell, 1991, Probe for measuring soil specific heat using a heat pulse method, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55, 291, 10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500010052x · DOI
  3. De Vries, 1952, A nonstationary method for determining thermal conductivity of soil in situ, Soil Sci., 73, 83, 10.1097/00010694-195202000-00001 · DOI
  4. Ghauman, 1985, Thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, and thermal capacity of some Nigerian soils, Soil Sci., 139, 74, 10.1097/00010694-198501000-00011 · DOI
  5. R.D. Jackson, S.A. Taylor, Heat transfer, Am. Soc. Agron., in: C.A. Black (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, 9, 1965, pp. 349–356

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Metadata

Authors
Abu-Hamdeh, N. H., Khdair, A. I., & Reeder, R. C.
Venue
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
1073-1078
ISSN
0017-9310
Cited by
105
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review