The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore
Abstract
Drawing on prior empirical research based on disclosure behavior in developed western markets, this study examines the association of ownership structure with the voluntary disclosures of listed companies in the Asian settings of Hong Kong and Singapore. An analysis of annual reporting practices shows that the extent of outside ownership is positively associated with voluntary disclosures. In particular, the results also indicate that the level of information disclosure is likely to be less in “insider” or family-controlled companies, a significant feature of the Hong Kong and Singapore stock markets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany
Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3 · Cited by 926
Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Some Malaysian evidence
Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2007) · Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society · doi:10.1108/14720700710756535 · Cited by 608
Glaum, M., Schmidt, P., Street, D. L., & Vogel, S. (2013) · Accounting and Business Research · doi:10.1080/00014788.2012.711131 · Cited by 241
García-Meca, E., & Sánchez-Ballesta, J. P. (2010) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2010.496979 · Cited by 197
International business research and risky investments, an analysis of FDI in conflict zones
Driffield, N., Jones, C., & Crotty, J. (2013) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.03.001 · Cited by 115
Enache, L., & Hussainey, K. (2020) · Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting · doi:10.1007/s11156-019-00794-8 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Chau, G. K., & Gray, S. J.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Accounting
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-265
- ISSN
- 0020-7063 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045267273
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
