Cited by 83Advanced Database Systems and QueriesUsability and User Interface DesignVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Two experimental comparisons of relational and hierarchical database models

Brosey, Margaret, Shneiderman, Ben·1978·International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0020-7373(78)80024-8

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brosey, M., & Shneiderman, B.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1978-11
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
625-637
ISSN
0020-7373 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043892562
Cited by
83
References
19
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
relational model, database management systems, data model, human-computer interaction, problem solving, memorization, presentation order, user background

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review