The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Production of protein nanoparticles by electrospray drying
Open accessAbstract
The feasibility of producing relatively monodisperse and biologically active insulin particles by electrospray drying is demonstrated. The process entails dissolving dry insulin in an acidic ethanol–water solution. The solution is then electrosprayed and, after solvent evaporation, dry residues can be collected on suitable deposition substrates. Particles were sized visually, using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and aerodynamically, using an inertial impactor. When electrosprays of nearly saturated solutions were operated in the stable cone-jet mode, impactor data showed that the particle average aerodynamic diameter ranged from about 88 to 110 nm in diameter and the distributions were quasi-monodisperse with relative standard deviation estimated at approximately 10%. SEM obsevations for the same conditions showed average particle dimensions ranging from 98 to 117 nm, with predominantly doughnut shapes. Smaller particles can be generated by decreasing the insulin concentration and/or by spraying smaller liquid flow rates. Although the maximum production rate for monodisperse insulin nanoparticles from a single cone-jet is low, at about 0.23 mg h-1 overall production can be increased by multiplexing the device with microfabrication techniques. Increasing production rate from a single cone-jet by at least one order of magnitude can be achieved also by increasing the liquid flow rate. The resulting particles have larger sizes, on the order of 600 nm, but particle monodispersity is compromised and particle morphology is drastically modified, probably as a consequence of a different electrospray operating mode. The biological activity of the electrospray-processed insulin samples was confirmed by comparing binding properties on insulin receptors against a control sample.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
Cited by
Electrospraying route to nanotechnology: An overview
Jaworek, A., & Sobczyk, A. T. (2008) · Journal of Electrostatics · doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.001 · Cited by 963
Micro- and nanoparticle production by electrospraying
Jaworek, A. (2007) · Powder Technology · doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2007.01.035 · Cited by 512
Production methods for nanodrug particles using the bottom-up approach
Chan, H.-K., & Kwok, P. C. L. (2011) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.011 · Cited by 451
Electrospraying of polymers with therapeutic molecules: State of the art
Bock, N., Dargaville, T. R., & Woodruff, M. A. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.03.002 · Cited by 440
Issues in long-term protein delivery using biodegradable microparticles
Ye, M., Kim, S., & Park, K. (2010) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.05.011 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Gomez, A., Bingham, D., Juan, L. D., & Tang, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Aerosol Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 561-574
- ISSN
- 0021-8502 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993541286
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Production of protein nanoparticles by electrospray drying. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-8502(97)10031-3
- The paper
- Gomez, A., Bingham, D., Juan, L. D., & Tang, K. (1998). Production of protein nanoparticles by electrospray drying. Journal of Aerosol Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-8502(97)10031-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.