Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Production of protein nanoparticles by electrospray drying

Open access
Gomez, A., Bingham, D., Juan, L.de, Tang, K.·1998·Journal of Aerosol Science

Abstract

The feasibility of producing relatively monodisperse and biologically active insulin particles by electrospray drying is demonstrated. The process entails dissolving dry insulin in an acidic ethanol–water solution. The solution is then electrosprayed and, after solvent evaporation, dry residues can be collected on suitable deposition substrates. Particles were sized visually, using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and aerodynamically, using an inertial impactor. When electrosprays of nearly saturated solutions were operated in the stable cone-jet mode, impactor data showed that the particle average aerodynamic diameter ranged from about 88 to 110 nm in diameter and the distributions were quasi-monodisperse with relative standard deviation estimated at approximately 10%. SEM obsevations for the same conditions showed average particle dimensions ranging from 98 to 117 nm, with predominantly doughnut shapes. Smaller particles can be generated by decreasing the insulin concentration and/or by spraying smaller liquid flow rates. Although the maximum production rate for monodisperse insulin nanoparticles from a single cone-jet is low, at about 0.23 mg h-1 overall production can be increased by multiplexing the device with microfabrication techniques. Increasing production rate from a single cone-jet by at least one order of magnitude can be achieved also by increasing the liquid flow rate. The resulting particles have larger sizes, on the order of 600 nm, but particle monodispersity is compromised and particle morphology is drastically modified, probably as a consequence of a different electrospray operating mode. The biological activity of the electrospray-processed insulin samples was confirmed by comparing binding properties on insulin receptors against a control sample.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-8502(97)10031-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Gomez, A., Bingham, D., Juan, L. D., & Tang, K.
Venue
Journal of Aerosol Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-06
Volume
29
Issue
5-6
Pages
561-574
ISSN
0021-8502 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993541286
Cited by
161
References
1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Production of protein nanoparticles by electrospray drying. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-8502(97)10031-3
The paper
Gomez, A., Bingham, D., Juan, L. D., & Tang, K. (1998). Production of protein nanoparticles by electrospray drying. Journal of Aerosol Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-8502(97)10031-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.