The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predicting protein folding types by distance functions that make allowances for amino acid interactions.
Open accessAbstract
Given the amino acid composition of a protein, how may one predict its folding type? Although around this problem a number of methods have been proposed, none of them has taken into account the correlative effect among different amino acids, and hence the accuracy of prediction could not be improved to the extent that it should have. In view of this, a new method has been developed in which the similarity between two protein molecules is based on the scale of Mahalanobis distance rather than on the ordinary intuitive geometric distances, such as Minkowski's distance and Euclidian distance. By introducing the Mahalanobis distance, the correlative effect among different amino acids can be automatically incorporated. Predictions have been performed for 131 real proteins consisting of alpha, beta, alpha+beta, and alpha/beta proteins. The results indicate that the rates of correct prediction for both alpha and beta proteins are 100%, and those for alpha+beta and alpha/beta are 88.9 and 89.7%, respectively, with an average accuracy of 94.7%. Predictions have also been performed for 10,000 simulated proteins generated by Monte Carlo sampling for each of the above four folding types, yielding an average accuracy of 95.9%. The accuracy thus obtained for the simulated proteins can avoid the bias due to the limited number of testing proteins selected arbitrarily by different investigators and hence can be regarded as an objective accuracy. It is anticipated that a method with such a high objective accuracy should become a reliable tool in predicting the protein folding type and a useful tool for improving the prediction of secondary structure as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition
Chou, K.-C. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.024 · Cited by 1,225
Self-citationChou, K.-C., & Shen, H.-B. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011335 · Cited by 1,157
Self-citationRecent progress in protein subcellular location prediction
Chou, K.-C., & Shen, H.-B. (2007) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ab.2007.07.006 · Cited by 770
Self-citationChou, K.-C., & Cai, Y.-D. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m204161200 · Cited by 483
Self-citationA novel approach to predicting protein structural classes in a (20–1)‐D amino acid composition space
Chou, K. (1995) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340210406 · Cited by 428
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chou, K. C., & Zhang, C. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 22014-22020
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1588131283
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting protein folding types by distance functions that make allowances for amino acid interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)31748-9
- The paper
- Chou, K. C., & Zhang, C. T. (1994). Predicting protein folding types by distance functions that make allowances for amino acid interactions. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)31748-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.