The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant-mPLoc: A Top-Down Strategy to Augment the Power for Predicting Plant Protein Subcellular Localization
Open accessAbstract
One of the fundamental goals in proteomics and cell biology is to identify the functions of proteins in various cellular organelles and pathways. Information of subcellular locations of proteins can provide useful insights for revealing their functions and understanding how they interact with each other in cellular network systems. Most of the existing methods in predicting plant protein subcellular localization can only cover three or four location sites, and none of them can be used to deal with multiplex plant proteins that can simultaneously exist at two, or move between, two or more different location sits. Actually, such multiplex proteins might have special biological functions worthy of particular notice. The present study was devoted to improve the existing plant protein subcellular location predictors from the aforementioned two aspects. A new predictor called "Plant-mPLoc" is developed by integrating the gene ontology information, functional domain information, and sequential evolutionary information through three different modes of pseudo amino acid composition. It can be used to identify plant proteins among the following 12 location sites: (1) cell membrane, (2) cell wall, (3) chloroplast, (4) cytoplasm, (5) endoplasmic reticulum, (6) extracellular, (7) Golgi apparatus, (8) mitochondrion, (9) nucleus, (10) peroxisome, (11) plastid, and (12) vacuole. Compared with the existing methods for predicting plant protein subcellular localization, the new predictor is much more powerful and flexible. Particularly, it also has the capacity to deal with multiple-location proteins, which is beyond the reach of any existing predictors specialized for identifying plant protein subcellular localization. As a user-friendly web-server, Plant-mPLoc is freely accessible at http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/. Moreover, for the convenience of the vast majority of experimental scientists, a step-by-step guide is provided on how to use the web-server to get the desired results. It is anticipated that the Plant-mPLoc predictor as presented in this paper will become a very useful tool in plant science as well as all the relevant areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Nearest neighbor pattern classification
Cover, T., & Hart, P. (1967) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1967.1053964 · Cited by 16,936
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence
Shafer, G. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv10vm1qb · Cited by 11,711
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence
Shafer, G. (1976) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691214696 · Cited by 9,083
The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes
Tatusov, R. L., Fedorova, N. D., Jackson, J. D., Jacobs, A. R., Kiryutin, B., Koonin, E. V., Krylov, D. M., Mazumder, R., Mekhedov, S. L., Nikolskaya, A. N., et al. (2003) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-4-41 · Cited by 4,430
Predicting Subcellular Localization of Proteins Based on their N-terminal Amino Acid Sequence
Emanuelsson, O., Nielsen, H., Brunak, S., & von Heijne, G. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.3903 · Cited by 4,263
Pfam: clans, web tools and services
Finn, R. D. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj149 · Cited by 2,302
Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo‐amino acid composition
Chou, K. (2001) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.1035 · Cited by 1,943
Self-citationSchaffer, A. A. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.14.2994 · Cited by 1,386
Chou, K.-C., & Shen, H.-B. (2008) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.494 · Cited by 1,223
Self-citation
Cited by
Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition
Chou, K.-C. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.024 · Cited by 1,225
Self-citationChou, K.-C., & Shen, H.-B. (2010) · Natural Science · doi:10.4236/ns.2010.210136 · Cited by 347
Self-citationMachine learning: a powerful tool for gene function prediction in plants
Mahood, E. H., Kruse, L. H., & Moghe, G. D. (2020) · Applications in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1002/aps3.11376 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Chou, K.-C., & Shen, H.-B.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-06-28
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e11335
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012686113
- Cited by
- 1,157
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 17.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant-mPLoc: A Top-Down Strategy to Augment the Power for Predicting Plant Protein Subcellular Localization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0011335
- The paper
- Chou, K.-C., & Shen, H.-B. (2010). Plant-mPLoc: A Top-Down Strategy to Augment the Power for Predicting Plant Protein Subcellular Localization. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011335
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.