The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Specific, high affinity binding of chitin fragments to tomato cells and membranes. Competitive inhibition of binding by derivatives of chitooligosaccharides and a Nod factor of Rhizobium.
Open accessAbstract
Suspension-cultured tomato cells have a sensitive perception system for chitin fragments with a degree of polymerization (DP) > or = 4 and react to these compounds with a transient alkalinization of their culture medium (Felix, G., Regenass, M., and Boller, T. (1993) Plant. J. 4, 307-316). A chitin fragment with DP 5 was aminated at the reducing end and coupled to t-butoxycarbonyl-L-[35S]methionine via an amidoglycine spacer. The radiolabeled chitin fragment (approximately 1000 Ci/mmol) exhibited specific, saturable, reversible binding to whole tomato cells as well as to tomato microsomal membranes with dissociation constants of 1.4 and 23 nM, respectively. Binding of the radioligand was competed by chitin fragments of different DP with IC50 values (50% inhibition of binding) that closely paralleled the concentrations inducing the alkalinization response half-maximally. Deacetylated chitooligosaccharides and N-propanoyl chitooligosaccharides were weak elicitors of the alkalinization response as well as weak competitors of radioligand binding. A lipochitooligosaccharide (Nod factor) from Rhizobium leguminosarum stimulated the alkalinization response in tomato cells half-maximally at 3 nM and competed radioligand binding to the cells with an IC50 of 8 nM. These results demonstrate the presence of a high affinity binding site for chitin fragments on the tomato cell membrane that may function as a receptor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sharp, J. K., McNeil, M., & Albersheim, P. (1984) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)90865-3 · Cited by 261
Cited by
Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences
Nürnberger, T., Brunner, F., Kemmerling, B., & Piater, L. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0119.x · Cited by 1,286
Chemoperception of Microbial Signals in Plant Cells
Boller, T. (1995) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.46.1.189 · Cited by 591
Self-citationREGULATION OF SYMBIOTIC ROOT NODULE DEVELOPMENT
Schultze, M., & Kondorosi, A. (1998) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.32.1.33 · Cited by 530
Oligosaccharide signalling for defence responses in plant
Shibuya, N., & Minami, E. (2001) · Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1006/pmpp.2001.0364 · Cited by 527
Oligosaccharins: structures and signal transduction
C�t�, F., & Hahn, M. G. (1994) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00016481 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Baureithel, K., Felix, G., & Boller, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 17931-17938
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1531847963
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific, high affinity binding of chitin fragments to tomato cells and membranes. Competitive inhibition of binding by derivatives of chitooligosaccharides and a Nod factor of Rhizobium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)32399-2
- The paper
- Baureithel, K., Felix, G., & Boller, T. (1994). Specific, high affinity binding of chitin fragments to tomato cells and membranes. Competitive inhibition of binding by derivatives of chitooligosaccharides and a Nod factor of Rhizobium. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)32399-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.