Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences

Nürnberger, Thorsten, Brunner, Frédéric, Kemmerling, Birgit, Piater, Lizelle·2004·Immunological Reviews

Abstract

Summary: Innate immunity constitutes the first line of defense against attempted microbial invasion, and it is a well‐described phenomenon in vertebrates and insects. Recent pioneering work has revealed striking similarities between the molecular organization of animal and plant systems for nonself recognition and anti‐microbial defense. Like animals, plants have acquired the ability to recognize invariant pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that are characteristic of microbial organisms but which are not found in potential host plants. Such structures, also termed general elicitors of plant defense, are often indispensable for the microbial lifestyle and, upon receptor‐mediated perception, inevitably betray the invader to the plant's surveillance system. Remarkable similarities have been uncovered in the molecular mode of PAMP perception in animals and plants, including the discovery of plant receptors resembling mammalian Toll‐like receptors or cytoplasmic nucleotide‐binding oligomerization domain leucine‐rich repeat proteins. Moreover, molecular building blocks of PAMP‐induced signaling cascades leading to the transcriptional activation of immune response genes are shared among the two kingdoms. In particular, nitric oxide as well as mitogen‐activated protein kinase cascades have been implicated in triggering innate immune responses, part of which is the production of anti‐microbial compounds. In addition to PAMP‐mediated pathogen defense, disease resistance programs are often initiated upon plant‐cultivar‐specific recognition of microbial race‐specific virulence factors, a recognition specificity that is not known from animals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0119.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,286

Metadata

Authors
Nürnberger, T., Brunner, F., Kemmerling, B., & Piater, L.
Venue
Immunological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-05
Volume
198
Issue
1
Pages
249-266
ISSN
  • 0105-2896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-065X
OpenAlex
W2074512572
Cited by
1,286
References
5
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0119.x
The paper
Nürnberger, T., Brunner, F., Kemmerling, B., & Piater, L. (2004). Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences. Immunological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0119.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.