The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Defective mismatch repair in extracts of colorectal and endometrial cancer cell lines exhibiting microsatellite instability.
Open accessAbstract
A replication error (RER+) phenotype, characterized by somatic instability in simple repeated sequences, is associated with several types of cancer. To determine if a defect in DNA replication fidelity or repair of replication errors might explain this instability, we compared both processes in cell-free extracts from RER+ endometrial and colorectal cancer cell lines to RER- cell lines. SV40 origin-dependent replication of a microsatellite sequence is highly accurate in cell extracts regardless of their RER phenotype. However, extracts from RER+ cell lines are defective in mismatch repair, while extracts of RER- cell lines are not. Lack of repair was observed when the signal (a nick) for strand-specific repair was either 3' or 5' to the mispair. One colorectal cancer cell line contained deletions in both alleles of the putative mismatch repair gene hMSH2, and one endometrial cancer cell line contained a 4-base pair duplication in one hMSH2 allele. No hMSH2 mutation was detected in the other allele or in the other five RER+ cell lines. Repair was readily detected when each of the defective extracts was mixed with a repair-proficient extract, demonstrating that no trans-acting inhibitor is present. Attempts to complement the repair deficiencies by mixing two different defective extracts identified three combinations that restored repair. The data suggest that: (i) defective repair is associated with colorectal and endometrial cancer and, by extrapolation, with other types of cancer; (ii) mutations in the hMSH2 gene, and possibly other genes, result in defective mismatch repair; (iii) the defect(s) in these lines likely involves pre-incision events or the excision step, but not the incision, polymerization, or ligation steps; and (iv) at least four functional complementation groups for mismatch repair may be involved in human cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer
Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81333-1 · Cited by 4,919
Genetic instabilities in human cancers
Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/25292 · Cited by 4,168
Redundancy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH3 and MSH6 in MSH2-dependent mismatch repair
Marsischky, G. T., Filosi, N., Kane, M. F., & Kolodner, R. (1996) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.10.4.407 · Cited by 581
Novel DNA mismatch-repair activity involving YB-1 in human mitochondria
de Souza-Pinto, N. C., Mason, P. A., Hashiguchi, K., Weissman, L., Tian, J., Guay, D., Lebel, M., Stevnsner, T. V., Rasmussen, L. J., & Bohr, V. A. (2009) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.01.021 · Cited by 214
Zhu, Y.-M., Das-Gupta, E. P., & Russell, N. H. (1999) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v94.2.733 · Cited by 118
Checkpoint mechanisms at the intersection between DNA damage and repair
Lazzaro, F., Giannattasio, M., Puddu, F., Granata, M., Pellicioli, A., Plevani, P., & Muzi-Falconi, M. (2009) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.022 · Cited by 94
Yao, Y., Tao, H., Kim, J. J., Burkhead, B., Carloni, E., Gasbarrini, A., & Sepulveda, A. R. (2004) · Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1038/labinvest.3700117 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Umar, A., Boyer, J. C., Thomas, D. C., Nguyen, D. C., Risinger, J. I., Boyd, J., Ionov, Y., Perucho, M., & Kunkel, T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 14367-14370
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1651950734
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.