Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Error induction and correction by mutant and wild type T4 DNA polymerases. Kinetic error discrimination mechanisms.

Open access
Clayton, L.K., Goodman, M.F., Branscomb, E.W., Galas, D.J.·1979·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The fidelity of DNA synthesis as determined by the misincorporation of the base analogue 2-aminopurine in competition with adenine has been measured as a function of deoxynucleoside triphosphate substrate concentrations using purified mutator (L56), antimutator (L141), and wild type (T4D) T4 DNA polymerases. Although the rates of both incorporation and turnover of aminopurine and adenine decrease as substrate concentrations are decreased, the ratio of turnover/polymerase activity is increased. Thus, the nuclease/polymerase ratio of each of these three DNA polymerases can be controlled. The misincorporation of aminopurine decreases with decreasing substrate concentrations such that all three enzymes approach nearly identical misincorporation frequencies at the lowest substrate concentration. The increased accuracy of DNA synthesis corresponds to conditions producing a high nuclease/polymerase ratio. The misinsertion frequency for aminopurine is independent of substrate concentrations and enzyme phenotype; therefore, the increased accuracy of DNA synthesis with decreasing substrate concentrations is shown to be a result of increased nuclease activity and not increased polymerase or nuclease specificity. The data are analyzed in terms of a kinetic model of DNA polymerase accuracy which proposes that discrimination in nucleotide insertion and removal is based on the free energy difference between matched and mismatched base pairs. A value of 1.1 kcal/mol free energy difference, delta G, between adenine: thymine and aminopurine:thymine base pairs is predicted by model analysis of the cocentration dependence of aminopurine misincorporation and removal frequencies. An independent estimate of this free energy difference based on the 6-fold higher apparent Km of T4 DNA polymerase for aminopurine compared to adenine also gives a value of 1.1 kcal/mol. It is shown that the aminopurine misinsertion frequency for an enzyme having either extremely low 3'-exonuclease activity, Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, or no measurable exonuclease activity, calf thymus DNA polymerase alpha, is 12 to 15%, which is similar to that for the T4 polymerases and consistent with delta G approximately 1.1 kcal/mol.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)37742-6

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Clayton, L. K., Goodman, M. F., Branscomb, E. W., & Galas, D. J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979-03
Volume
254
Issue
6
Pages
1902-1912
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1574146885
Cited by
164
References
0
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Error induction and correction by mutant and wild type T4 DNA polymerases. Kinetic error discrimination mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)37742-6
The paper
Clayton, L. K., Goodman, M. F., Branscomb, E. W., & Galas, D. J. (1979). Error induction and correction by mutant and wild type T4 DNA polymerases. Kinetic error discrimination mechanisms. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)37742-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.