Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DNA polymerase insertion fidelity. Gel assay for site-specific kinetics.

Open access
Boosalis, M S, Petruska, J, Goodman, M F·1987·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

A quantitative assay based on gel electrophoresis is described to measure nucleotide insertion kinetics at an arbitrary DNA template site. The assay is used to investigate kinetic mechanisms governing the fidelity of DNA synthesis using highly purified Drosophila DNA polymerase alpha holoenzyme complex and M13 primer-template DNA. Km and Vmax values are reported for correct insertion of A and misinsertion of G, C, and T opposite a single template T site. The misinsertion frequencies are 2 X 10(-4) for G-T and 5 X 10(-5) for both C-T and T-T relative to normal A-T base pairs. The dissociation constant of the polymerase-DNA-dNTP complex, as measured by Km, plays a dominant role in determining the rates of forming right and wrong base pairs. Compared with Km for insertion of A opposite T (3.7 +/- 0.7 microM), the Km value is 1100-fold greater for misinsertion of G opposite T (4.2 +/- 0.4 mM), and 2600-fold greater for misinsertion of either C or T opposite T (9.8 +/- 4.2 mM). These Km differences indicate that in the enzyme binding site the stability of A-T base pairs is 4.3 kcal/mol greater than G-T pairs and 4.9 kcal/mol greater than C-T or T-T pairs. In contrast to the large differences in Km, differences in Vmax are relatively small. There is only a 4-fold reduction in Vmax for insertion of G opposite T and an 8-fold reduction for C or T opposite T, compared with the correct insertion of A. For the specific template T site investigated, the nucleotide insertion fidelity for Drosophila polymerase alpha seems to be governed primarily by a Km discrimination mechanism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)47850-7

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Boosalis, M. S., Petruska, J., & Goodman, M. F.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-10
Volume
262
Issue
30
Pages
14689-14696
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1597138031
Cited by
332
References
23
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA polymerase insertion fidelity. Gel assay for site-specific kinetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)47850-7
The paper
Boosalis, M. S., Petruska, J., & Goodman, M. F. (1987). DNA polymerase insertion fidelity. Gel assay for site-specific kinetics. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)47850-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.