Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 799

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estrogen control of progesterone receptor in human breast cancer. Correlation with nuclear processing of estrogen receptor.

Open access
Horwitz, K.B., McGuire, W.L.·1978·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

MCF-7 cells of human breast cancer origin responded to estradiol (E) treatment with increased levels of progesterone receptor (PgR) showing that human breast cells which have undergone malignant changes can continue to synthesize a specific protein under hormone control. These results were obtained by studying the effects of addition and withdrawal of E on PgR synthesis and correlating this with estrogen receptor (ER) binding translocation nuclear processing reactions and restoration of unoccupied ER. In cells treated 1-5 days with E (.001-100 nM) basal PgR levels (.3-.7 pmol/mg of deoxyribonucleic acid) increased 3-6 fold. PgR response was dose-dependent with .1 nM E (a physiologic dose) the maximal effective dose. Growth and induction of PgR by .1 nM E was suppressed by an antiestrogen Tamoxifen at 10000-fold molar excess (1 mcgM) but was reversed by supraphysiological E (10 nM) which reduced the molar excess of Tamoxifen to only 100-fold. In this cell line ER unoccupied by hormone was not restricted to the cytoplasm (Rc) since a portion of the cellular receptor can also be found in the nucleus in unoccupied form (RN). The level of PgR induction correlated with the extent of Rc binding and translocation and also with the extent of Rn binding. At .1 nM E 85% of Rc and Rn were depleted and PgR was maximally stimulated. The levels of PgR also paralleled processing of bound ER (RnE) appearing in the nucleus. Processing during which a new steady-state level of RnE was achieved appeared to be a saturable event. At low E doses despite Rc and Rn binding of E RnE failed to accumulate and total ER decreased. The loss approached 70% at .1 nM E. But at higher E doses some nuclear receptor remained unprocessed and RnE levels increased. The processing effect was rapid beginning within 10 minutes of E addition and completed by 5 hours. Processed RnE levels were seen before PgR induction and during maintenance of induced PgR states. In estrogen withdrawn cells PgR fell in parallel with end of processing and restoration of Rc and Rn.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)38062-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 799

Metadata

Authors
Horwitz, K. B., & McGuire, W. L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1978-04
Volume
253
Issue
7
Pages
2223-2228
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1811094195
Cited by
799
References
2
FWCI
26.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estrogen control of progesterone receptor in human breast cancer. Correlation with nuclear processing of estrogen receptor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)38062-6
The paper
Horwitz, K. B., & McGuire, W. L. (1978). Estrogen control of progesterone receptor in human breast cancer. Correlation with nuclear processing of estrogen receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)38062-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.