Cited by 220Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

The receptor-binding domain of human apolipoprotein E. Monoclonal antibody inhibition of binding.

Open access
Weisgraber, K H, Innerarity, T L, Harder, K J, Mahley, R W, Milne, R W, Marcel, Y L, Sparrow, J T·1983·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

To investigate the potential of monoclonal antibodies as probes to determine the receptor-binding domain of apolipoprotein E (apo-E), five apo-E antibodies were tested to see if any of them inhibited 125I-apo-E3 . dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine binding to apo-B,E receptors on cultured fibroblasts. Only one of the five antibodies, referred to as 1D7, was found to inhibit binding, blocking greater than 90% of the receptor-binding activity of apo-E3 dimyristoylphosphatidyl-choline. The 1D7 Fab fragments were also effective inhibitors. The 1D7 bound to a Mr = 22,000 NH2-terminal thrombolytic fragment of apo-E (residues 1-191) and to a 93-residue cyanogen bromide fragment of apo-E (residues 126-218). The four noninhibitory antibodies bound only to the NH2-terminal thrombolytic fragment. These results suggested that the 1D7 epitope is contained between residues 126 and 191, and that the epitopes of the other antibodies are not contained in this region. The use of synthetic apo-E fragments, which cover various lengths of the sequence from residues 129-169, and human apo-E variants with substitutions at residues 145, 146, or 158, narrowed the location of the 1D7 epitope to residues 139-169 and, most likely, to the immediate vicinity of residues 140-150. It is of interest that 1D7 was found to bind to the same region of apo-E that has been implicated as the receptor-binding domain in receptor-binding studies using human apo-E variants and apo-E3 fragments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)44181-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weisgraber, K. H., Innerarity, T. L., Harder, K. J., Mahley, R. W., Milne, R. W., Marcel, Y. L., & Sparrow, J. T.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-10
Volume
258
Issue
20
Pages
12348-12354
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1576642143
Cited by
220
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4
FWCI
17.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, receptor binding domain, epitope mapping, Fab fragment
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antigen-Antibody Complex, Apolipoproteins, Apolipoproteins E, Cells, Cultured, Dogs, Fibroblasts, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Kinetics, Lipoproteins, LDL, Male, Receptors, Cell Surface, Receptors, LDL, Skin, Species Specificity, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review