The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of glutamic acid 204 and aspartic acid 200 in chitinase A1 of Bacillus circulans WL-12 as essential residues for chitinase activity.
Open accessAbstract
Prokaryotic chitinases, class III plant chitinases, yeast chitinases, and endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidases share weak amino acid sequence similarities at the certain region of each enzyme. These regions have been assumed to be important for catalytic activities of the enzymes. To verify this assumption, three amino acid residues (Ser-160, Asp-200, Glu-204) in chitinase A1 of Bacillus circulans WL-12 were chosen, based on the amino acid sequence alignment of the regions sharing sequence similarity, and were replaced by site-directed mutagenesis. Kinetic parameters for 4-methylumbelliferyl-N,N',N"-triacetylchitotriose hydrolysis were determined with wild-type and seven mutant chitinases. Chitinases with Glu-204-->Gln mutation and Glu-204-->Asp mutation were essentially inactive and kcat values of these chitinases were approximately 1/5,000 and 1/17,000 of that of wild-type chitinase, respectively. Asp-200-->Asn mutation decreased the kcat value to approximately 1/350 of that of the wild-type enzyme, while the Km value decreased only slightly. On the other hand, neither the kcat value nor the Km value was affected by Asp-200-->Glu mutation. Thus, it appeared that Glu-204 and Asp-200 are directly involved in the catalytic events of chitinase A1. The role of the carboxyl group of Asp-200 can be fully substituted by that of Glu residue. The Ser-160-->Ala mutant retained 10% activity of the wild-type chitinase indicating that the hydroxyl group of Ser-160 is not absolutely required for the catalytic activity. These results indicate a lysozyme-type catalytic mechanism of the chitinase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biotechnological aspects of chitinolytic enzymes: a review
Dahiya, N., Tewari, R., & Hoondal, G. S. (2006) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-005-0183-7 · Cited by 544
The molecular biology of chitin digestion
Cohen-Kupiec, R., & Chet, I. (1998) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(98)80058-x · Cited by 334
Molecular cloning and characterization of chitinase genes from Candida albicans.
McCreath, K. J., Specht, C. A., & Robbins, P. W. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.7.2544 · Cited by 101
Banani, H., Spadaro, D., Zhang, D., Matic, S., Garibaldi, A., & Gullino, M. L. (2015) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.01.002 · Cited by 81
Feng, J. (2004) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/cwh110 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Watanabe, T., Kobori, K., Miyashita, K., Fujii, T., Sakai, H., Uchida, M., & Tanaka, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 18567-18572
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108859348
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of glutamic acid 204 and aspartic acid 200 in chitinase A1 of Bacillus circulans WL-12 as essential residues for chitinase activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)46665-8
- The paper
- Watanabe, T., Kobori, K., Miyashita, K., Fujii, T., Sakai, H., Uchida, M., & Tanaka, H. (1993). Identification of glutamic acid 204 and aspartic acid 200 in chitinase A1 of Bacillus circulans WL-12 as essential residues for chitinase activity. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)46665-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.