Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CGP-12177. A hydrophilic beta-adrenergic receptor radioligand reveals high affinity binding of agonists to intact cells.

Open access
Staehelin, M, Simons, P, Jaeggi, K, Wigger, N·1983·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

A new, hydrophilic beta-adrenergic receptor radioligand, (+/-)-[3H]CGP-12177 (4-(3-tertiarybutylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy)-benzimidazole-2-on hydrochloride), was synthesized and radiolabeled to 40 Ci/mmol. The nonspecific binding of this compound to turkey erythrocyte ghosts and C6 glioma cell membranes was less than 5% of the total binding at five times the appropriate KD. Binding assays of intact C6 glioma cells also showed low nonspecific binding, less than 20% of the total binding at five times the appropriate KD. The affinities of the antagonists (-)- and (+)-propranolol as well as of the agonist (-)-isoproterenol were examined by their potency to displace various radioligands from intact C6 glioma cell and membrane preparations. With membrane preparations, both [3H] CGP-12177 and [3H]dihydroalprenolol (DHA) were displaced stereospecifically by the antagonists (-)- and (+)-propranolol and the agonist (-)-isoproterenol. With whole cells, [3H]CGP-12177 and [3H]DHA behaved differently. [3H]DHA and [3H]carazolol could be stereospecifically displaced by antagonists but only partially displaced by agonists, while [3H]CGP-12177 could be completely displaced by both antagonists and agonists as in membranes. In contrast to [3H]CGP-12177, the lipophilic ligand [3H]DHA is actually taken up by cells. The inability of agonists to displace lipophilic radioligands from receptors on intact cells may not be due to a low affinity of agonists for receptors on cells, but to an agonist-induced change in the receptors which renders them inaccessible to hydrophilic agonists and antagonists. This change is likely to be their internalization into the cell.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)32689-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Staehelin, M., Simons, P., Jaeggi, K., & Wigger, N.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-03
Volume
258
Issue
6
Pages
3496-3502
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1515847027
Cited by
288
References
1
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CGP-12177. A hydrophilic beta-adrenergic receptor radioligand reveals high affinity binding of agonists to intact cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)32689-9
The paper
Staehelin, M., Simons, P., Jaeggi, K., & Wigger, N. (1983). CGP-12177. A hydrophilic beta-adrenergic receptor radioligand reveals high affinity binding of agonists to intact cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)32689-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.