Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 738

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Two dimensional gel electrophoresis and computer analysis of proteins synthesized by clonal cell lines.

Open access
Garrels, J.I.·1979·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

An improved method of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis has been developed which produces high resolution, reproducible images suitable for computer analysis. In the images that are presented, more than 800 proteins have been resolved without significant overlap, and many more proteins can be detected after longer exposures. To establish the usefulness of such methods for detailed quantitative comparisons of cultured cells, extensive controls have been carried out to test the reproducibility of the electrophoretic procedures, the sample preparation procedures, and the cell culture conditions. A computerized scanning system has been developed which can automatically detect and integrate the densities of the spots on a two-dimensional fluorogram or autoradiogram. The corresponding proteins from two or more samples can then be matched and their intensities compared. Several types of graphic output have been used to display the number and magnitude of the differences between the compared samples. These methods were used to study the patterns of protein synthesis in the nerve cell line B103 and the glial cell line B9. Both exponentially dividing and stationary cultures were analyzed and the relative rates of synthesis of approximately 300 proteins were compared by computer. For each cell line, no major qualitative differences were found between dividing and stationary phase cells although numerous quantitative differences of up to 15-fold were detected. The proteins that were increased or decreased in rate of synthesis as B103 cells became confluent were in general not the same proteins that were increased or decreased in rate of synthesis as B9 cells reached confluence, indicating that most of the changes do not reflect growth control responses common to all cells. When the two cell lines were analyzed in the same state of growth and compared by computer, qualitative differences were found in approximately 5% of the proteins analyzed, and at least 40% of the shared proteins were involved in quantitative differences of 2-fold or more. The rates of synthesis of the shared proteins were more divergent between the two cell lines than between dividing and stationary phase cells of either line. These studies show, therefore, that these cell lines can be distinguished, regardless of growth state, by their cell-specific proteins and by their characteristic rates of synthesis of many of the shared proteins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)36039-3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 738

Metadata

Authors
Garrels, J. I.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979-08
Volume
254
Issue
16
Pages
7961-7977
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1584004556
Cited by
738
References
0
FWCI
32.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two dimensional gel electrophoresis and computer analysis of proteins synthesized by clonal cell lines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)36039-3
The paper
Garrels, J. I. (1979). Two dimensional gel electrophoresis and computer analysis of proteins synthesized by clonal cell lines. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)36039-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.