The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Properties of dissociatively extracted fetal tooth matrix proteins. I. Principal molecular species in developing bovine enamel.
Open accessAbstract
A sequential dissociative extraction scheme is described in which tooth matrix proteins are extracted first in 4 M guanidine HCl, pH 7.4, and then in 4 M guanidine HCl, 0.5 M EDTA, pH 7.4, both with protease inhibitors present. The latter step dissolves the mineralized portion of the tissue and extracts noncollagenous proteins closely associated with hydroxyapatite crystallites in the mineralized matrix. In fetal bovine enamel, the initial dissociative extraction step completely removes proline-rich amelogenins from the tissue without dissolving the enamel apatite. The amelogenin proteins consist of several species on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with sodium dodecyl sulfate, but display anomalous migration behavior relative to conventional marker proteins in this technique. Subsequent extraction of fetal bovine enamel with guanidine HCl/EDTA removes matrix enamelins, acidic glycoproteins that are tightly bound to the enamel hydroxyapatite. This latter fetal protein type has not been isolated previously. The enamelins are adsorbed strongly by DEAE-cellulose in 7 M urea and totally adsorb to synthetic apatite, even in 4 M guanidine HCl. The enamelins display normal behavior on polyacrylamide gels and stain positively for sialic acid/phosphate and carbohydrate. With advancing tooth maturation, amelogenins disappear while enamelins are conserved. Gel filtration chromatography in 4 M guanidine HCl showed amelogenin components at apparent molecular weights of approximately 25,000, 15,000, 9,500, 7,500, and 6,000, while the enamelins eluted at Mr positions of approximately 72,000, 56,000, 42,000, 30,000, 21,000, 13,000, and 8,000. The gel filtration data showed a clear shift in molecular size population from higher to lower components for both amelogenins and enamelins with progressive enamel maturation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Osteonectin, a bone-specific protein linking mineral to collagen
Termine, J. D., Kleinman, H. K., Whitson, S. W., Conn, K. M., McGarvey, M. L., & Martin, G. R. (1981) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(81)90037-4 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationRoss, F. P., Chappel, J., Alvarez, J. I., Sander, D., Butler, W. T., Farach-Carson, M. C., Mintz, K. A., Robey, P. G., Teitelbaum, S. L., & Cheresh, D. A. (1993) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)98430-9 · Cited by 537
Fisher, L. W., Hawkins, G. R., Tuross, N., & Termine, J. D. (1987) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)47991-4 · Cited by 441
Self-citationMethod Development of Efficient Protein Extraction in Bone Tissue for Proteome Analysis
Jiang, X., Ye, M., Jiang, X., Liu, G., Feng, S., Cui, L., & Zou, H. (2007) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr070056t · Cited by 144
Mineralization in Organic Matrix Frameworks
Veis, A. (2003) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2113/0540249 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Termine, J. D., Belcourt, A. B., Christner, P. J., Conn, K. M., & Nylen, M. U.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-10
- Volume
- 255
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 9760-9768
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1510981058
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Properties of dissociatively extracted fetal tooth matrix proteins. I. Principal molecular species in developing bovine enamel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)43458-8
- The paper
- Termine, J. D., Belcourt, A. B., Christner, P. J., Conn, K. M., & Nylen, M. U. (1980). Properties of dissociatively extracted fetal tooth matrix proteins. I. Principal molecular species in developing bovine enamel. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)43458-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.