Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potent and selective inhibition of human nitric oxide synthases. Selective inhibition of neuronal nitric oxide synthase by S-methyl-L-thiocitrulline and S-ethyl-L-thiocitrulline.

Open access
Furfine, E S, Harmon, M F, Paith, J E, Knowles, R G, Salter, M, Kiff, R J, Duffy, C, Hazelwood, R, Oplinger, J A, Garvey, E P·1994·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Potent and selective inhibition of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) compared to endothelial NOS (eNOS) and inducible NOS (iNOS) may be useful to treat cerebral ischemia (stroke) and other neurodegenerative diseases. S-Methyl-L-thiocitrulline (Me-TC) and S-ethyl-L-thiocitrulline (Et-TC) inhibited the oxidation of L-arginine and the L-arginine-independent oxidation of NADPH by nNOS from human brain. Me-TC and Et-TC were slow, tight binding inhibitors of nNOS with second-order association rate constants (kon) of 2.6 x 10(5) M-1 s-1 and 1.3 x 10(5) M-1 s-1, respectively. The respective dissociation rate constants (koff) were 3 x 10(-4) s-1 and 0.7 x 10(-4) s-1. Thus, the Kd values calculated from koff/kon were 1.2 and 0.5 nM, respectively. L-Arginine was a competitive inhibitor of Me-TC and Et-TC binding with competition constant (Ks) values of 2.2 and 2.7 microM, respectively. The Km of nNOS for L-arginine was 1.6 microM. The active site concentration of nNOS was estimated by titration with Et-TC. Based on this active site concentration, a kcat of 0.4 s-1 for the oxidation of L-arginine, was calculated. Me-TC and Et-TC were less potent inhibitors of human iNOS (Ki values of 34 and 17 nM, respectively) and human eNOS (Ki values of 11 and 24 nM). Thus, Me-TC and Et-TC were 10- and 50-fold, respectively, more potent inhibitors of nNOS than eNOS. Furthermore, Me-TC was also 17-fold selective for rat nNOS in neuronal tissue compared to rat eNOS in vascular endothelium, suggesting that Me-TC may be selective for nNOS in vivo and therefore, may be therapeutically useful to treat neurodegenerative diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)47072-x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Furfine, E. S., Harmon, M. F., Paith, J. E., Knowles, R. G., Salter, M., Kiff, R. J., Duffy, C., Hazelwood, R., Oplinger, J. A., & Garvey, E. P.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-10
Volume
269
Issue
43
Pages
26677-26683
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135704180
Cited by
219
References
3
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potent and selective inhibition of human nitric oxide synthases. Selective inhibition of neuronal nitric oxide synthase by S-methyl-L-thiocitrulline and S-ethyl-L-thiocitrulline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)47072-x
The paper
Furfine, E. S., Harmon, M. F., Paith, J. E., Knowles, R. G., Salter, M., Kiff, R. J., Duffy, C., Hazelwood, R., Oplinger, J. A., & Garvey, E. P. (1994). Potent and selective inhibition of human nitric oxide synthases. Selective inhibition of neuronal nitric oxide synthase by S-methyl-L-thiocitrulline and S-ethyl-L-thiocitrulline. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)47072-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.