Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Variability of the intracellular ionic environment of Escherichia coli. Differences between in vitro and in vivo effects of ion concentrations on protein-DNA interactions and gene expression.

Open access
Richey, B, Cayley, D S, Mossing, M C, Kolka, C, Anderson, C F, Farrar, T C, Record, M T·1987·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Effects of changes in intracellular ion concentrations on the interactions of Escherichia coli lac repressor with lac operator mutants and on the interactions of RNA polymerase with various promoters have been investigated in vivo. The intracellular ionic environment was reproducibly varied by changing the osmolality of the 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid minimal growth medium. As the osmolality of the growth medium is varied from 0.1 to 1.1 osmolal, the total intracellular concentration of K+ increases linearly from 0.23 +/- 0.03 to 0.93 +/- 0.05 molal and the total intracellular concentration of glutamate increases linearly from 0.03 +/- 0.01 to 0.26 +/- 0.02 molal. The sum of the changes in the total concentrations of these two ions appears sufficient to compensate for a given change in external osmolality, indicating that K+ and glutamate are the primary ionic osmolytes under these conditions and that these ions are free in the cytoplasm. In support of this, in vivo 39K NMR experiments as a function of external osmolality indicate that changes in the total cytoplasmic K+ concentration correspond to changes in the free cytoplasmic K+ concentration. Extents of interaction of lac repressor and RNA polymerase with their specific DNA sites were monitored by measuring the amounts of beta-galactosidase produced under the control of these sites. For both lac repressor and RNA polymerase, it was found that formation of functional protein-DNA complexes in vivo is only weakly (if at all) dependent on intracellular ion concentration. These results contrast strongly with those obtained on these systems in vitro, which showed that both the equilibria and kinetics of binding are extremely salt-dependent. We discuss several possible mechanisms by which E. coli may compensate for the potentially disruptive effects of these large changes in the intracellular ionic environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)48218-x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Richey, B., Cayley, D. S., Mossing, M. C., Kolka, C., Anderson, C. F., Farrar, T. C., & Record, M. T.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-05
Volume
262
Issue
15
Pages
7157-7164
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1504479686
Cited by
270
References
34
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variability of the intracellular ionic environment of Escherichia coli. Differences between in vitro and in vivo effects of ion concentrations on protein-DNA interactions and gene expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)48218-x
The paper
Richey, B., Cayley, D. S., Mossing, M. C., Kolka, C., Anderson, C. F., Farrar, T. C., & Record, M. T. (1987). Variability of the intracellular ionic environment of Escherichia coli. Differences between in vitro and in vivo effects of ion concentrations on protein-DNA interactions and gene expression. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)48218-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.