The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fidelity of phi 29 DNA polymerase. Comparison between protein-primed initiation and DNA polymerization.
Open accessAbstract
Phi 29 DNA polymerase is able to catalyze two different synthetic reactions: protein-primed initiation and DNA polymerization. We have studied the fidelity of phi 29 DNA polymerase when carrying out these two reactions. Global fidelity was dissected into three steps: insertion discrimination, mismatch elongation, and proofreading. The insertion discrimination of phi 29 DNA polymerase in DNA polymerization ranged from 10(4) to 10(6). The efficiency of mismatch elongation was 10(5)-10(-6)-fold lower than that of a properly paired primer terminus. These factors indicate that DNA polymerization catalyzed by phi 29 DNA polymerase is a highly accurate process. Conversely, the insertion fidelity of protein-primed initiation was quite low, the insertion discrimination factor being about 10(2). Mismatch elongation discrimination was also rather low: mismatched terminal protein (TP).dNMP complexes were elongated from 2- to 6-fold more slowly than the correct TP.dNMP complex. Even more, the 3'-->5' exonuclease activity of phi 29 DNA polymerase was unable to act on the TP.dNMP initiation complex, precluding the possibility that a wrong dNMP covalently linked to TP could be excised and corrected. Therefore, protein-primed initiation can be predicted as a quite inaccurate reaction. The problem of maintaining the sequence at the DNA ends is discussed in the context of a recently described model for protein-primed initiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FIDELITY MECHANISMS IN DNA REPLICATION
Echols, H., & Goodman, M. F. (1991) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.002401 · Cited by 712
Misalignment-mediated DNA synthesis errors
Kunkel, T. A. (1990) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00487a001 · Cited by 299
Cited by
Real-Time DNA Sequencing from Single Polymerase Molecules
Eid, J., Fehr, A., Gray, J., Luong, K., Lyle, J., Otto, G., Peluso, P., Rank, D., Baybayan, P., Bettman, B., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1162986 · Cited by 3,732
Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification
Dean, F. B., Hosono, S., Fang, L., Wu, X., Faruqi, A. F., Bray-Ward, P., Sun, Z., Zong, Q., Du, Y., Du, J., et al. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.082089499 · Cited by 1,467
Somatic mutation in single human neurons tracks developmental and transcriptional history
Lodato, M. A., Woodworth, M. B., Lee, S., Evrony, G. D., Mehta, B. K., Karger, A., Lee, S., Chittenden, T. W., D’Gama, A. M., Cai, X., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab1785 · Cited by 570
Single-Neuron Sequencing Analysis of L1 Retrotransposition and Somatic Mutation in the Human Brain
Evrony, G. D., Cai, X., Lee, E., Hills, L. B., Elhosary, P. C., Lehmann, H. S., Parker, J. J., Atabay, K. D., Gilmore, E. C., Poduri, A., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.035 · Cited by 548
Single Cell Genomics: Advances and Future Perspectives
Macaulay, I. C., & Voet, T. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004126 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Esteban, J. A., Salas, M., & Blanco, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2719-2726
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2580627695
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fidelity of phi 29 DNA polymerase. Comparison between protein-primed initiation and DNA polymerization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)53833-3
- The paper
- Esteban, J. A., Salas, M., & Blanco, L. (1993). Fidelity of phi 29 DNA polymerase. Comparison between protein-primed initiation and DNA polymerization. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)53833-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.