Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,016

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Enzymology of Control by Feedback Inhibition

Open access
Gerhart, John C., Pardee, Arthur B.·1962·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

One way in which an organism controls its biosynthetic path- ways is by feedback inhibition. This control adjusts the rate of production of the end products of pathways, such as amino acids and nucleotides, to the rate of synthesis of macromolecules, such as proteins and nucleic acids. Control is imposed by the end product itself in a simple and rapid manner: the end product stops production of more of itself by inhibiting the activity of the first enzyme unique to its pathway. Consequently, if an end product is not continually removed into macromolecules, additional end product is not made. The organism benefits from feedback inhibition, because it avoids wasting resources of carbon, nitrogen, and energy on end products which are not used. Certainly it is a widespread and effective metabolic con- trol. Many biosynthetic pathways in bacteria have feedback inhibition, and a few instances are also known for higher or- ganisms (1). In this article, a feedback inhibition is investigated to learn more about its enzymological mechanism. Until now, feedback inhibition has been studied at a metabolic level where one us- ually asks which end product inhibits which enzyme. The question now asked is, how does the end product of a pathway inhibit the first enzyme? This question is justified because many known feedback inhibitions appear competitive, as if in- hibition results from a competition of the inhibitor and substrate for the same groups of the active site on the first enzyme. To the enzymologist, competition is wholly unexpected because the end product and substrate often differ greatly in size, shape, and charge, in contrast with classical competitors (2). How can there be competition when a site specific for the substrate seems unsuited for also binding the end product? The problem of the mechanism of inhibition was approached by using the first enzyme unique to pyrimidine biosynthesis in Escherichiu coli. This enzyme is aspartate transcarbamylase, which catalyzes the reaction shown in Fig. 1. It is known that in the bacterium the activity of aspartate transcarbamylase is closely controlled by an end product, probably a cytosine de- rivative, and that inhibition of this enzyme is important for controlling the whole pathway (3). Aspartate transcarbamylase is especially suited for enzymological study because it can be obtained easily in a highly purified state (4). It is inhibited by a nucleotide end product which competes with a structurally lunrelated substrate, an amino acid. J Experiments to be described have two purposes: first, to find * This work was aided bv support from United States Public

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)60389-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Gerhart, J. C., & Pardee, A. B.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1962-03
Volume
237
Issue
3
Pages
891-896
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1568502048
Cited by
1,016
References
1
FWCI
31.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Enzymology of Control by Feedback Inhibition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)60389-8
The paper
Gerhart, J. C., & Pardee, A. B. (1962). The Enzymology of Control by Feedback Inhibition. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)60389-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.