Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 445

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CONTROL OF PYRIMIDINE BIOSYNTHESIS IN ESCHERICHIA COLI BY A FEED-BACK MECHANISM

Open access
Yates, Richard A., Pardee, Arthur B.·1956·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The mechanisms by which a cell can control its biosynthetic processes are important from the point of cellular economy, yet they are little understood. It is known that bacteria must have such control systems, since their biochemical processes are so well coordinated, as shown by failure of the cell to accumulate large amounts of metabolites in the medium (1). Several indications of control mechanisms have been found. One type of observation is that addition of a few micrograms per ml. of normal purines (2)) pyrimidines (1)) or amino acids (3,l) to growth media of normal bacteria could result in nearly exclusive incorporation of these materials into cell constituents, in preference to de novo synthesis of the materials by the cell. It has been noticed also that production of intermediates of the above materials can be inhibited by addition of the end-products to cultures of suitable bacterial mutants. Gots and Chu (4) and Love and Gots (5) found that addition of purines to the culture medium of purinerequiring Escherichia coli mutants caused inhibition of formation of two purine precursors, and Brooke et al. (6) showed the inhibition of erotic acid (0A)i formation in the presence of uracil by pyrimidine-requiring Aerobacter aerogenes mutants. Adelberg and Umbarger (7) observed that the presence of the growth factor, valine, inhibited formation in an E. coli mutant of a-ketoisovalerate, a valine precursor, and commented that the unknown mechanism was undoubtedly wide-spread and important to the economy of the cell. Work from this Laboratory indicated that the presence of uracil inhibited formation of pyrimidine intermediates earlier than erotic acid in pyrimidinerequiring E. coli mutants (8). It seemed of interest to determine whether this observation plus the above facts could be the results of normal selfregulatory mechanisms of the cell which allowed formation of no more

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)65188-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 445

Metadata

Authors
Yates, R. A., & Pardee, A. B.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1956-08
Volume
221
Issue
2
Pages
757-770
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097758310
Cited by
445
References
0
FWCI
11.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CONTROL OF PYRIMIDINE BIOSYNTHESIS IN ESCHERICHIA COLI BY A FEED-BACK MECHANISM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)65188-9
The paper
Yates, R. A., & Pardee, A. B. (1956). CONTROL OF PYRIMIDINE BIOSYNTHESIS IN ESCHERICHIA COLI BY A FEED-BACK MECHANISM. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)65188-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.