The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Relationship between the Insulin-binding Capacity of Fat Cells and the Cellular Response to Insulin
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The effects of trypsin on the insulin-binding capacity of fat cells were studied with [125I]iodoinsulin, which was shown to be a valid tracer of native insulin. The binding of insulin to isolated fat cells was approximately 5 microunits/100 mg when the concentration of the hormone in the incubation medium was 100 microunits per ml. The initial step of the insulin receptor interaction followed the law of mass action. When the cells were exposed to trypsin (1 mg per ml) for 15 sec and for 15 min, the binding capacity was reduced by more than 80 and 98%, respectively. Upon subsequent incubation of trypsin-treated cells for 2 hours after inactivation of the enzyme, the binding capacity was partly restored. However, the maximum binding capacity of cells was only 9 and 4 microunits/100 mg (depending upon the length of the initial trypsin treatment) while that of untreated cells was 62 microunits/100 mg. The apparent dissociation constant of the insulin receptor system (approximately 1 milliunit per ml or 7 nm) was not significantly altered by the above treatment. Glucose metabolism in recovered cells was less sensitive to insulin as compared with that of untreated cells; however, the metabolism in all cell preparations responded normally to higher concentrations of insulin when more than 1.5 microunits of insulin were bound to 100 mg of fat cells. This indicates that glucose metabolism in intact fat cells is stimulated maximally when only approximately 2.4% of the total insulin receptors on the cells are occupied by insulin. Since the binding follows the law of mass action, it appears that the presence of excess receptors on fat cells renders the cells highly sensitive to insulin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of Insulin Action and Insulin Resistance
Petersen, M. C., & Shulman, G. I. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00063.2017 · Cited by 3,028
Insulin: The Structure in the Crystal and its Reflection in Chemistry and Biology by
Blundell, T., Dodson, G., Hodgkin, D., & Mercola, D. (1972) · Advances in Protein Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60143-6 · Cited by 836
RIZZA, R. A., MANDARINO, L. J., & GERICH, J. E. (1982) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-54-1-131 · Cited by 696
Mechanisms of insulin resistance in human obesity: evidence for receptor and postreceptor defects.
Kolterman, O. G., Insel, J., Saekow, M., & Olefsky, J. M. (1980) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci109790 · Cited by 664
Membrane Receptors and Hormone Action
Cuatrecasas, P., & Hollenberg, M. D. (1976) · Advances in Protein Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60481-7 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Kono, T., & Barham, F. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1971-10
- Volume
- 246
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 6210-6216
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1480810179
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship between the Insulin-binding Capacity of Fat Cells and the Cellular Response to Insulin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)61777-6
- The paper
- Kono, T., & Barham, F. W. (1971). The Relationship between the Insulin-binding Capacity of Fat Cells and the Cellular Response to Insulin. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)61777-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.